READING NONVERBAL CUES TO EMOTIONS: THE ADVANTAGES AND LIABILITIES OF RELATIONSHIP CLOSENESS
READING NONVERBAL CUES TO EMOTIONS: THE ADVANTAGES AND LIABILITIES OF RELATIONSHIP CLOSENESS
复制标题
解读情绪的非语言暗示：关系亲密的优点和缺点
DOI：
10.1007/s10919-004-4158-7
复制
发表时间：
2004
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
B. DePaulo
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. W. Sternglanz;B. DePaulo
摘要：研究人员对亲密朋友、不太亲密的朋友和陌生人阅读非语言情感线索的准确性进行了研究。48名志愿者被录下了谈论一段经历的录像，在这段经历中，他们要么感到非常高兴，要么感到非常悲伤，要么感到非常愤怒。一半的时间他们清楚地表达了自己的情绪，一半的时间他们隐藏了自己的情绪。48名法官无声地观看了这些录像带，并试图辨别出这些人的情绪。每个评委都看了一盘录像带，里面有一个柏拉图式的朋友和一个陌生人。总的来说，朋友比陌生人更能准确地识别被试的情绪，然而，不太亲密的朋友比更亲密的朋友更能正确地判断隐藏的悲伤和愤怒。在讨论这些发现时，我们将动机不准确、不确定性和情绪作为行动的召唤。
ABSTRACT:Accuracy at reading nonverbal cues to emotions was examined for close friends, less close friends, and strangers. Forty-eight senders were videotaped talking about an experience during which they felt either very happy, very sad, or very angry. Half of the time they expressed their emotion clearly, and half of the time they concealed their emotion. Forty-eight judges watched these tapes without sound and attempted to identify the senders’ emotions. Each judge watched a videotape of both a platonic friend and a stranger. Overall, friends were more accurate than strangers at identifying the senders’ emotions, however, less close friends were better than closer friends at correctly judging concealed sadness and anger. In discussing these findings, we consider models of motivated inaccuracy, accommodatingness, and emotions as calls to action.
情绪的人际背景：对亲密朋友和同学的愤怒。
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1996
期刊：
Child development.
影响因子：
--
作者：
Whitesell,NR;Harter,S
通讯作者：
Harter,S
多受众问题：社会认知的战略传播视角。
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Fleming,JH;Darley,JM;Hilton,JL;Kojetin,BA
通讯作者：
Kojetin,BA