Influencing A Partner to Use a Condom

Influencing A Partner to Use a Condom
复制标题

影响伴侣使用安全套

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1994
影响因子:
4
通讯作者:
L. A. Peplau
L. A. Peplau
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sherrine Chapman De Bro;S. Campbell;L. A. Peplau

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

对于年轻的异性恋成年人用来说服新的性伴侣使用或避免使用避孕套的影响策略,我们知之甚少。调查了393名大学生对六种安全套力量策略的看法和体验。总的来说,当目标是说服伴侣使用避孕套时,学生们将这些策略按性别归类为“女性化”,而当试图避免使用避孕套时,学生们将其归类为“男性化”。策略的有效性和舒适度因学生的性别和被评估的特定策略而异。在学生使用策略的实际体验中也出现了性别差异。在试图鼓励使用避孕套时,男子最常使用的是诱惑;而妇女最常使用的策略是拒绝性交。男性比女性更倾向于使用诱惑、奖励和信息来避免使用安全套。了解安全套使用领域的性别和社会影响的影响进行了讨论。
Little is known about the influence strategies that young heterosexual adults use to persuade a new sexual partner to use or avoid the use of condoms. College students' (N = 393) opinions about and experiences with six condom power strategies were examined. Overall, students gender-typed the strategies as “feminine” when the goal was to persuade a partner to use condoms and as “masculine” when trying to avoid condom use. Effectiveness and comfort ratings of the strategies varied both by students' gender and the particular tactic being evaluated. Gender differences also emerged in students' actual experiences with the strategies. When trying to encourage condom use, men utilized seduction most often; whereas, withholding sex was the most popular tactic used by women. For avoiding condom use, men were more likely than women to employ seduction, reward, and information. Implications for understanding the impact of gender and social influence in the domain of condom use are discussed.
性、谎言和艾滋病毒。
DOI: 10.1056/nejm199003153221111
发表时间: 1990
期刊: The New England journal of medicine
影响因子: --
作者:
Cochran,SD;Mays,VM
通讯作者: Mays,VM
黑人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔妇女对艾滋病风险的看法和降低风险活动的问题。
DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.43.11.949
发表时间: 1988
期刊: The American psychologist
影响因子: --
作者:
Mays,VM;Cochran,SD
通讯作者: Cochran,SD