Assessing the impact of ureteral stent design on patient comfort.
Assessing the impact of ureteral stent design on patient comfort.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.019
复制
发表时间:
2009-06
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Comfort Study Team
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lingeman JE;Preminger GM;Goldfischer ER;Krambeck AE;Comfort Study Team
This study assessed near-term comfort of newly designed ureteral study stents or marketed control stents (Polaris™, Percuflex Plus®). Study stents substituted distal 6Fr pigtail ends with ≤3Fr loops. Reduced material in situ was hypothesized to enhance comfort. Utility of the patient self-administered Ureteric Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (USSQ) was assessed. This 4-arm, multicenter study enrolled adults requiring retrograde unilateral ureteral stent placement for 4–28 days. USSQ administration occurred prior to placement (Baseline), at Day 4 post-placement, and Day 30 post-removal. 236 patients were randomized (1:1:1:1 ratio): Short Loop Tail (n=60), Long Loop Tail (n=59), Percuflex Plus (n=64); and Polaris (n=53). Overall, pain worsened from Baseline-Day 4 and improved from Day 4-Day 30. Mean pain medication usage peaked for all stents at Day 1 post-placement. Common device-related symptoms were mild or moderate in severity including flank pain (n=47 patients), hematuria (n=39), dysuria (n=34), frequent urination (n=30), and urinary urgency (n=27). Six patients experienced 9 device-related adverse events requiring hospitalization. All adverse events resolved, most within 3 days of in-patient treatment. Although not statistically significant, patients stented with the Short Loop Tail had lower USSQ pain scores at Day 4 post-placement and lower pain medication usage at Day 1 post-placement, when pain peaked for all stent groups, suggesting that ureteral stent comfort, especially pain, may be improved with less material in situ. The USSQ may be better suited for longer-term comparisons among stented and non-stented patients rather than in this short term ureteral stent trial.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
6.6
作者:
POLLARD, SG;MACFARLANE, R
通讯作者:
MACFARLANE, R
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
El-Nahas, AR;El-Assmy, AM;El-Kappany, HA
通讯作者:
El-Kappany, HA
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Joshi, HB;Stainthorpe, A;Timoney, AG
通讯作者:
Timoney, AG
影响因子:
6.6
作者:
PRYOR, JL;LANGLEY, MJ;JENKINS, AD
通讯作者:
JENKINS, AD
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Lee, C;Kuskowski, M;Monga, M
通讯作者:
Monga, M