Stakeholder Behavior in Disaster Risk Reduction at the Time of Rehabilitation and Reconstruction in Aceh
Stakeholder Behavior in Disaster Risk Reduction at the Time of Rehabilitation and Reconstruction in Aceh
复制标题
亚齐恢复重建期间减少灾害风险的利益相关者行为
DOI：
10.1088/1755-1315/630/1/012015
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sasaki;D.;Iqbal;M.;Sofyan;H.;Nizamuddin;N.;& Affan;M.
2015年3月第三届联合国世界减少灾害风险大会通过的《仙台减少灾害风险框架》将了解灾害风险列为四个优先行动事项之一。此外，获得灾害风险信息被视为其七项全球目标之一。此外，人们普遍认识到，加强备灾对于实现所谓的”重建得更好“具有重大意义。“这项研究的关键问题是：在亚齐的恢复和重建过程中，利益相关者在减少灾害风险（DRR）方面的行为有何不同？由于参与灾后恢复重建的利益相关者众多，他们的行为可能存在一定的差距。本研究采用文本挖掘分析方法，以检查出版物的内容发布的DRR利益相关者。作者使用KH Coder作为分析软件，并检查了三个主要文件，所有这些文件都描述了亚齐在2005年至2008年期间的恢复和重建情况。因此，我们发现，亚齐和尼亚斯恢复和重建执行机构和亚行在其报告中往往强调类似的措辞，而国际乐施会的表现则不同。这可能源于每个组织的性质，因此，我们认为非常需要有熟悉重建和恢复的各个方面的协调员。
The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, which was adopted at the Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction in March 2015, positions understanding disaster risk as one of the four priorities for action. Also, access to disaster risk information is regarded as one of its seven global targets. Furthermore, it is widely recognized that the enhancement of disaster preparedness has great significance for achieving what is termed as" build back better." The key research question of this study is: how does stakeholder behavior in disaster risk reduction (DRR) differ at the time of rehabilitation and reconstruction in Aceh? Since many different types of stakeholders participated in the rehabilitation and reconstruction process, there might exist some gaps in their behaviors. This study adopts text mining analysis as the methodology to examine the content of publications issued by DRR stakeholders. The authors utilize KH Coder as the analysis software and examine the three major documents, all of which have described the situation of rehabilitation and reconstruction in Aceh during the period from 2005 to 2008. As a result, we found that the Executing Agency of Rehabilitation and Reconstruction for Aceh and Nias (BRR) and the ADB tended to stress similar words in their reports, whereas Oxfam International behaved in a different manner. This may stem from the nature of each organization and, thus, we considered that the existence of coordinators who are well acquainted with every aspect of reconstruction and rehabilitation is much needed.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
0.8
作者：
Y. Ono;Daisuke Sasaki
通讯作者：
Daisuke Sasaki
2004 年印度洋海啸后亚齐省的减灾政策和法规
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Syamsidik;I. Rusydy;S. Arief;K. Munadi;E. Melianda
通讯作者：
E. Melianda
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
2^<nd> Investigation Report of 2004 Northern Sumatra Earthquake, Chapter 1(GSES Nagoya University) 1
影响因子：
--
作者：
Y.Funaki;Holger Meinhardt;Tatsuaki Kuroda
通讯作者：
Tatsuaki Kuroda
亚太国家减灾态度分析：2018年亚洲减灾部长级会议官方声明文本挖掘
影响因子：
0.8
作者：
Sasaki;D.
通讯作者：
D.
在废墟中确定优先事项：海地灾后重建的组织方法
DOI：
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.08.005
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Hooper
通讯作者：
M. Hooper