Reading for Meaning: What Influences Paragraph Understanding in Aphasia?
Reading for Meaning: What Influences Paragraph Understanding in Aphasia?
复制标题
阅读意义：什么影响失语症的段落理解？
DOI：
10.1044/2017_ajslp-16-0213
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
M. Garraffa
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Webster;Julie Morris;D. Howard;M. Garraffa
目的
本研究考察了文本长度、可读性、命题内容和信息类型等文本变量对失语症患者阅读理解的影响。
方法
75名失语症患者的表现与87名年龄匹配的健康对照组参与者进行了比较。阅读理解从回答问题的准确性和阅读时间两个方面来考虑。失语症(PWA)受试者被分为两组(无阅读障碍[PWA：NRI]和阅读障碍[PWA：RI])，根据他们的表现是否在对照组参与者的第5个百分位数以内。
结果
作为对照组，PWA：NRI和PWA：RI在阅读时间和理解准确度方面都与对照组有显著差异。PWA：NRI和PWA：RI在准确性方面存在差异，但在阅读时间方面没有差异。可读性或命题密度对任何一组的理解准确性或阅读时间都没有显著影响。长度对阅读时间有显著影响，但对理解准确性无显著影响。所有小组都认为主要思想比细节更容易，陈述信息比推断更容易，对于需要跨段落整合信息的问题尤其困难(要点)。
结论
在描述失语症患者的阅读困难时，需要同时考虑理解的准确性和阅读速度。
Purpose
The current study investigated the effect of text variables including length, readability, propositional content, and type of information on the reading comprehension of people with aphasia.
Method
The performance of 75 people with aphasia was compared with 87 healthy, age-matched control participants. Reading comprehension was considered in terms of both accuracy in responding to questions tapping comprehension and reading time. Participants with aphasia (PWA) were divided into 2 groups (no reading impairment [PWA:NRI] and reading impairment [PWA:RI]) depending on whether their performance fell within the 5th percentile of control participants.
Results
As groups, both PWA:NRI and PWA:RI differed significantly from control participants in terms of reading time and comprehension accuracy. PWA:NRI and PWA:RI differed from each other in terms of accuracy but not reading time. There was no significant effect of readability or propositional density on comprehension accuracy or reading time for any of the groups. There was a significant effect of length on reading time but not on comprehension accuracy. All groups found main ideas easier than details, stated information easier than inferred, and had particular difficulty with questions that required integration of information across paragraphs (gist).
Conclusions
Both accuracy of comprehension and reading speed need to be considered when characterizing reading difficulties in people with aphasia.
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Just;P. Carpenter
通讯作者：
M. Just;P. Carpenter
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow;Le-Ann Milinder;Olivia Pullara;Barbara Herman
通讯作者：
Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow;Le-Ann Milinder;Olivia Pullara;Barbara Herman
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
KINTSCH, W
通讯作者：
KINTSCH, W