Beyond rationality in engineering design for sustainability
Beyond rationality in engineering design for sustainability
复制标题
超越可持续性工程设计的合理性
DOI：
10.1038/s41893-018-0054-8
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
27.6
通讯作者：
Bethany Gordon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Leidy E. Klotz;E. Weber;Eric J. Johnson;Tripp Shealy;Morela Hernandez;Bethany Gordon
如果您试图在自然界的限制内确保人类的长期福祉，那么您的设计就是为了可持续发展。这篇评论组织了描述认知偏见如何阻碍和帮助可持续性工程设计的研究。例如，设计师可能会因为短视的思维而忽视气候变化的影响，这种偏见可以通过生动地想象未来来克服。对于研究人员来说，这篇评论阐明了决策科学和工程设计融合的需求。对于设计师（也就是我们所有人）来说，该评论通过改变决策环境和深入了解我们自己的设计思维，为可持续发展提供了新的途径。随着时间的推移，在自然界的限制下确保人类福祉需要可持续发展的设计。这篇评论分析了认知偏见在多大程度上限制或帮助这种设计。它还提出了可能的变化，工程师的决策设置作为实现可持续发展的新途径。
If you try to ensure long-term human well-being within the limits of the natural world, then you design for sustainability. This Review organizes research describing how cognitive biases can hinder and help engineering design for sustainability. For example, designers might overlook climate change implications because of nearsighted thinking, a bias which can be overcome by vividly imagining the future. For researchers, this Review illuminates needs at the convergence of decision science and engineering design. For designers (that is, all of us), the Review promises new routes to sustainability, through changes to decision environments and through insights into our own design thinking.Ensuring human well-being within the limits of the natural world over time requires designing for sustainability. This Review analyses the extent to which cognitive biases can either limit or help such design. It also suggests possible changes to the decision settings of engineers as new ways to achieve sustainability.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Greenwald, AG;McGhee, DE;Schwartz, JLK
通讯作者：
Schwartz, JLK
影响因子：
30.7
作者：
Ebeling, Felix;Lotz, Sebastian
通讯作者：
Lotz, Sebastian