The dissociations of confidence from accuracy in forced-choice recognition judgments

The dissociations of confidence from accuracy in forced-choice recognition judgments
复制标题

强制选择识别判断中信心与准确性的分离

DOI:
10.1016/j.jml.2020.104189
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Hanczakowski M
Hanczakowski M
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hanczakowski M

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

如果那些塑造准确性的因素也塑造了信心,那么对记忆信心的判断很可能会跟踪记忆的准确性。在识别记忆中,准确性取决于目标和支持诱饵的证据的相对水平。随着目标和诱饵之间的差异增加,正确反应的可能性也会增加。相比之下,这项研究表明,信心可以依赖于支持所选目标的绝对证据,而不是目标和诱饵之间证据的平衡。在四个实验中,使用不同类型的强制选择识别测试,我们证明,通常操纵支持目标的证据强度会影响置信度判断,但改变支持诱惑的证据强度会产生强大的置信度与准确性分离,改变准确性而不影响置信度。总之,这些数据支持对强制选择识别的置信度的绝对说明,并证明跨识别条件的置信度与准确性的分离可能普遍存在。
Judgment of confidence in memory is likely to track memory accuracy if those factors shaping accuracy also shape confidence. In recognition memory, accuracy is determined by the relative level of evidence present for the target and that supporting the lures. As the discrepancy between targets and lures increases, so does the likelihood of correct responding. In contrast, this study shows that confidence can instead depend on theabsoluteevidence supporting the chosen target rather than the balance of evidence between targets and lures. In four experiments, using different types of forced-choice recognition tests, we demonstrate that generally manipulating the strength of evidence supporting targets affects confidence judgments but that varying the strength of evidence supporting lures creates robust confidence-accuracy dissociations, changing accuracy while not affecting confidence. Together, these data support an absolute account of confidence in forced-choice recognition and demonstrate that confidence-accuracy dissociations across recognition conditions are likely to be ubiquitous.
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139087759
发表时间: 2014-04
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
M. Lee;E. Wagenmakers
通讯作者: M. Lee;E. Wagenmakers
DOI: 10.1037/a0035940
发表时间: 2014-04-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
Wixted, John T.;Mickes, Laura
通讯作者: Mickes, Laura
强制选择联想识别:对全局记忆模型的影响
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.4.871
发表时间: 1993
期刊: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition
影响因子: --
作者:
S. Clark;A. Hori;D. Callan
通讯作者: D. Callan
基于特征和基于熟悉度的记忆的不同置信度-准确性关系。
DOI: 10.1037/a0021961
发表时间: 2011
期刊: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子: --
作者:
Reinitz,MarkTippens;Peria,WilliamJ;Seguin,JulieAnne;Loftus,GeoffreyR
通讯作者: Loftus,GeoffreyR
项目强度影响源置信度并改变源记忆 zROC 斜率。
DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000177
发表时间: 2016
期刊: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子: --
作者:
J. Starns;John C Ksander
通讯作者: John C Ksander