The limits of localism: a decade of disaster on homelessness in England
The limits of localism: a decade of disaster on homelessness in England
复制标题
地方主义的局限性：英国无家可归者十年的灾难
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
B. Watts
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Fitzpatrick;Hal Pawson;B. Watts
近年来，地方主义的言论和实践在英国政界和学术界引起了广泛支持。然而，这是本文的论点，有，或应该是，限制地方主义适用于基本的公民权利，
脆弱的人借鉴十年，混合方法的研究，我们使用的例子急剧上升的无家可归者在英格兰来说明我们的论点，地方主义的决策有一个内在的倾向，不利于社会边缘化群体。虽然我们承认，
通过在过去十年中推动无家可归的紧缩政策，我们提出了这样一个案例，即2010年后英国历届政府的地方主义议程也产生了独立和恶性的影响。至少，我们试图证明，地方主义不能被视为理所当然的进步
这种模式与中央集权制（即在全国范围内一致地执行一项政策）在相关情况下也完全可以从进步的角度进行辩护。
The rhetoric and practice of localism has attracted significant support within both political and academic circles in the UK in recent years. However, it is the contention of this article that there are, or should be, limits to localism as applied to the basic citizenship rights of
vulnerable people. Drawing on a ten-year, mixed-methods study, we use the example of sharply rising homelessness in England to illustrate our argument that localist policymaking has an intrinsic tendency to disadvantage socially marginalised groups. While we acknowledge the central role played
by austerity in driving up homelessness over the past decade, we advance the case that the post-2010 localist agenda of successive UK governments has also had an independent and malign effect. At the very least, we seek to demonstrate that localism cannot be viewed as a taken-for-granted progressive
model, with centralism (that is, the consistent implementation of a policy across a whole country) also perfectly defensible on progressive grounds in relevant circumstances.
大社会中的经济人：理解中产阶级的激进主义和邻避主义对新住房开发的影响
DOI：
10.1080/14036096.2014.947173
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
Housing, Theory and Society
影响因子：
--
作者：
Matthews P
通讯作者：
Matthews P