Community-powered urban stream restoration: A vision for sustainable and resilient urban ecosystems
Community-powered urban stream restoration: A vision for sustainable and resilient urban ecosystems
复制标题
社区驱动的城市河流恢复：可持续和有弹性的城市生态系统的愿景
DOI：
10.1086/721150
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Bond, Nick
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Scoggins, Mateo;Booth, Derek B.;Fletcher, Tim;Fork, Megan;Gonzalez, Ana;Hale, Rebecca L.;Hawley, Robert J.;Roy, Allison H.;Bilger, Erika E.;Bond, Nick
城市河流可以为生活在城市中的人们提供便利，但当河流退化时，这些好处就会减少，甚至可能造成伤害（疾病，有毒化合物等）。政府和机构投入资源，以改善城市溪流提供的价值和服务;然而，这些项目的构思、开发和实施可能没有社区成员和其他利益攸关方的有意义的参与。因此，项目目标可能与社区的愿望和需求不一致，项目可能无法实现其目标。2020年2月，第五届城市化与河流生态学研讨会（每3至5年举行一次的跨学科会议）在美国德克萨斯州奥斯汀举行，探讨城市河流项目的新方法，包括通过更好地将社区成员融入项目识别和决策来最大限度地发挥全部潜在效益的方法。研讨会包括深入讨论4个附近的实地案例研究，来自五大洲的多学科城市河流专家的参与，以及奥斯汀社区的投入。从案例研究和文献中，明确了权力、公平和价值观的差异，并使用现实世界的例子确定和分析了社区包容的体制障碍。研讨会的成果已被汇总到一个愿景，挑战目前的体制方法，以城市流管理和一套战略，系统地解决这些障碍，以改善恢复解决方案。在整个城市恢复过程中整合社区成员和其他利益攸关方，以及解决不同目标的透明决策过程，可以帮助确定实现河流恢复的生态和社会效益的适当目标。
Urban streams can provide amenities to people living in cities, but those benefits are reduced when streams become degraded, potentially even causing harm (disease, toxic compounds, etc.). Governments and institutions invest resources to improve the values and services provided by urban streams; however, the conception, development, and implementation of such projects may not include meaningful involvement of community members and other stakeholders. Consequently, project objectives may be misaligned with community desires and needs, and projects may fail to achieve their goals. In February 2020, the 5thSymposium on Urbanization and Stream Ecology, an interdisciplinary meeting held every 3 to 5 y, met in Austin, Texas, USA, to explore new approaches to urban stream projects, including ways to maximize the full range of potential benefits by better integrating community members into project identification and decision making. The symposium included in-depth discussion about 4 nearby field case studies, participation of multidisciplinary urban stream experts from 5 continents, and input from the Austin community. Institutional barriers to community inclusion were identified and analyzed using real-world examples, both from the case studies and from the literature, which clarified disparities in power, equity, and values. Outcomes of the symposium have been aggregated into a vision that challenges the present institutional approach to urban stream management and a set of strategies to systematically address these barriers to improve restoration solutions. Integrating community members and other stakeholders throughout the urban restoration process, and a transparent decision-making process to resolve divergent objectives, can help identify appropriate goals for realizing both the ecological and social benefits of stream restoration.
登录
查看更多内容
生物文化管理、土著和地方生态知识以及城市考验
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Heather McMillen;L. Campbell;E. Svendsen;Kekuhi Kealiikanakaoleohaililani;Kainana S. Francisco;C. Giardina
通讯作者：
C. Giardina
构建流域叙事：扩大城市河流恢复成功范围的方法
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Ken P. Yocom
通讯作者：
Ken P. Yocom
探索跨学科合作生产与城市可持续发展解决方案之间的联系：城市河流管理研讨会的案例研究
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
R. P. Bixler;J. A. Belaire;K. Faust;M. Scoggins;Ana M González
通讯作者：
Ana M González
土地是我的母亲
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1985
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Terry Djiniyini
通讯作者：
Terry Djiniyini
寻找我们的道路：城市水道修复和参与过程的案例研究
影响因子：
9.1
作者：
S. Moran;M. Perreault;R. Smardon
通讯作者：
R. Smardon