The Uncanny Valley Does Not Interfere with Level 1 Visual Perspective Taking.

The Uncanny Valley Does Not Interfere with Level 1 Visual Perspective Taking.
复制标题

不可思议的山谷不会干扰1级视觉视角的拍摄。

DOI:
10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.051
复制
发表时间:
2013-07-01
影响因子:
9.9
通讯作者:
Patel H
Patel H
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
MacDorman KF;Srinivas P;Patel H

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

当一个电脑动画人物看起来非常逼真时,观众会报告说他们失去了同情心;他们很难从人物的角度出发。为了解释这种被称为恐怖谷的视角转换障碍,提出了一种新的理论:当角色的视角与人类观察者的视角不同时,角色看起来越像人类或不那么怪异,它就越会干扰1级视觉视角转换(例如,因为角色竞争性地激活观察者大脑中的共享回路)。所提出的理论进行了评估,在三个实验中,涉及一个点计数的任务,参与者要么假设或忽略的角度不同的人物在他们的人类照片写实主义和怪异。虽然当观察者和角色面对的圆点数量相同时(一致条件)的反应时间和错误率低于当它们不同时(不一致条件),但在人类的照片现实主义或角色的怪异性与参与者的反应时间和错误率之间没有一致的模式。因此,所提出的理论是不支持1级视觉透视拍摄。由于恐怖谷对共情的影响以前没有被系统地研究过,这些结果提供了证据来排除一种可能的解释。
When a computer-animated human character looks eerily realistic, viewers report a loss of empathy; they have difficulty taking the character’s perspective. To explain this perspective-taking impairment, known as the uncanny valley, a novel theory is proposed: The more human or less eerie a character looks, the more it interferes with level 1 visual perspective taking when the character’s perspective differs from that of the human observer (e.g., because the character competitively activates shared circuits in the observer’s brain). The proposed theory is evaluated in three experiments involving a dot-counting task in which participants either assumed or ignored the perspective of characters varying in their human photorealism and eeriness. Although response times and error rates were lower when the number of dots faced by the observer and character were the same (congruent condition) than when they were different (incongruent condition), no consistent pattern emerged between the human photorealism or eeriness of the characters and participants’ response times and error rates. Thus, the proposed theory is unsupported for level 1 visual perspective taking. As the effects of the uncanny valley on empathy have not previously been investigated systematically, these results provide evidence to eliminate one possible explanation.
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
发表时间: 2003-08-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Greenwald, AG;Nosek, BA;Banaji, MR
通讯作者: Banaji, MR
DOI: 10.1186/1751-0759-1-22
发表时间: 2007-11-16
影响因子: 2.1
作者:
Decety J;Moriguchi Y
通讯作者: Moriguchi Y
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0935845100
发表时间: 2003-04-29
影响因子: 11.1
作者:
Carr, L;Iacoboni, M;Lenzi, GL
通讯作者: Lenzi, GL
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21287
发表时间: 2010-07-01
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Lombardo, Michael V.;Chakrabarti, Bhismadev;Baron-Cohen, Simon
通讯作者: Baron-Cohen, Simon
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.015
发表时间: 2010-11-01
影响因子: 9.9
作者:
Ho, Chin-Chang;MacDorman, Karl F.
通讯作者: MacDorman, Karl F.