Privacy as a fuzzy concept: A new conceptualization of privacy for practitioners

Privacy as a fuzzy concept: A new conceptualization of privacy for practitioners
复制标题

隐私作为一个模糊概念:从业者对隐私的新概念化

DOI:
10.1002/asi.23220
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Vasalou A
Vasalou A
中科院分区:
管理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Vasalou A

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

近年来,技术创新重新点燃了人们对隐私的兴趣,因为设计师、政策制定者和用户都在努力调和技术的优势与他们对隐私提出的新要求。受经典概念定义方法的驱动,学者们一直未能就隐私的统一定义达成一致。这对那些寻求通过其决定实施隐私的人构成了障碍。他们工作的一个关键组成部分是预测和应对潜在的隐私风险。在选择一个定义而不是另一个定义时,从业者可能会错过与隐私有关的微妙的上下文重叠,从而使他们随后的决定产生偏见。对于这些实际的努力,重要的是要采用一个包容性和丰富的定义。这一定义还应考虑到受可能损害隐私的决定影响的人,即公民和技术用户如何看待隐私。本文采用了一个原型的角度来看,承认概念的未来,并在一系列的实证研究中发展这样一个定义的隐私。隐私原型的相关性,然后探讨,因为它适用于隐私理论家,从业者和方法论,为未来的研究提出了新的途径。
In recent years, technological innovation has re‐ignited an interest in privacy as designers, policy makers, and users each strive to reconcile the advantages of technology with the new demands they pose for privacy. Driven by a classic approach to defining concepts, scholars have not been able to agree on a unified definition of privacy. This poses a barrier to those who seek to implement privacy through their decisions. A critical component of their work involves anticipating and responding to potential privacy risks. In choosing one definition over another, practitioners might be missing nuanced contextual overlaps that bear on privacy and thus bias their subsequent decisions. For these practical endeavors, it is important to adopt an inclusive and rich definition. Such a definition should also be responsive to how those affected by decisions that might compromise privacy, namely citizens and technology users, conceive of privacy. The present paper applies a prototype perspective on privacy that acknowledges the fuzziness of concepts and goes on to develop such a definition in a series of empirical studies. The relevance of the privacy prototype is then explored as it applies to privacy theorists, practitioners, and methodologists, suggesting new avenues for future research.
隐私的哲学理论:适当的在线隐私政策的含义
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00474.x
发表时间: 2007
期刊: Metaphilosophy
影响因子: 0.5
作者:
H. Tavani
通讯作者: H. Tavani
隐私研究中“背景”的反思分析:艾滋病毒护理的两个案例研究
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.06.001
发表时间: 2013
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
Mazanderani F
通讯作者: Mazanderani F
回避和秘密的黑暗面(和光明面)
DOI: 10.4324/9780203936849-9
发表时间: 2009
期刊: Philosophical Books
影响因子: --
作者:
T. Afifi;J. Caughlin;Walid A. Afifi
通讯作者: Walid A. Afifi
陌生人的最佳表现:与情境相关的泄露个人信息的意愿
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1430482
发表时间: 2009
期刊: Behavioral & Experimental Economics
影响因子: --
作者:
L. John;A. Acquisti;G. Loewenstein
通讯作者: G. Loewenstein
DOI: 10.2307/3102188
发表时间: 1968-03
影响因子: 0.7
作者:
Joseph Gray Jackson;A. Westin
通讯作者: Joseph Gray Jackson;A. Westin