Implementation and the Governance Problem
Implementation and the Governance Problem
复制标题
实施和治理问题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Cairney
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Cairney
本文有两个目的：资格英国政府的“问题”的治理与苏格兰和威尔士的比较，并使用实施研究（新的治理文献的祖先），以探索政策的发展，因为在英国的权力下放。它提出了一个令人费解的发现，从广泛的采访研究：虽然我们可能会期望英国政府的政策遭受更大的“实施差距”的基础上独特的治理问题（如更大的服务提供碎片化和自上而下的政策风格的意外后果），压力参与者在苏格兰和威尔士更有可能报告实施失败。使用一个“自上而下”的框架，它探讨了这一发现的三个主要解释：在英格兰的实施差距的大小被夸大的重点放在特定的治理问题，压力参与者的不满遵循不切实际的期望在下放领土;英国政府破坏了权力下放的政策实施，保持对关键政策工具的控制，并制定衡量执行成功的议程。
This article has two aims: to qualify the UK government’s ‘problem’ of governance in a comparison with Scotland and Wales, and to use implementation studies (the ancestors of the new governance literature) to explore policy developments since devolution in Britain. It presents a puzzling finding from extensive interview research: that while we may expect UK government policy to suffer a bigger ‘implementation gap’ based on distinctive governance problems (such as greater service delivery fragmentation and the unintended consequences of top-down policy styles), pressure participants in Scotland and Wales are more likely to report implementation failures. Using a ‘top-down’ framework, it explores three main explanations for this finding: that the size of the implementation gap in England is exaggerated by a focus on particular governance problems; that pressure participant dissatisfaction follows unrealistic expectations in the devolved territories; and that the UK government undermines devolved policy implementation, by retaining control of key policy instruments and setting the agenda on measures of implementation success.
权力下放改善了公共服务吗？
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Andrews R
通讯作者：
Andrews R