How Multidimensional Is Emotional Intelligence? Bifactor Modeling of Global and Broad Emotional Abilities of the Geneva Emotional Competence Test.

How Multidimensional Is Emotional Intelligence? Bifactor Modeling of Global and Broad Emotional Abilities of the Geneva Emotional Competence Test.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3390/jintelligence9010014
复制
发表时间:
2021-03-05
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Schlegel K
Schlegel K
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Simonet DV;Miller KE;Askew KL;Sumner KE;Mortillaro M;Schlegel K

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

本文运用多维智力理论,对日内瓦情绪能力测验(GECO)是否适用于更高层次的智力空间,以及情绪智力(EI)分支是否预测了与适应和动机相关的不同标准进行了评估。结合经典模型和S-1双因素模型,我们发现:(A)一阶斜率模型和双因素模型提供了较好且相对符合的表征自我调节能力独立于一般能力操作的智力结构,(B)剩余智力能力唯一地预测了流体智力参照的一般认知能力,以及(C)情绪识别和调节在控制了流体一般能力和五大人格特质后递增地预测平均绩点和相反方向的情感投入。通过心理测量学分析,结果是合格的,表明只有情绪调节具有足够的确定性和可靠的方差,超出一般能力因素,可以作为分析和解释的明显分数。研究结果呼吁重新研究情绪智力,将其作为一种多维智力,并强调需要对情绪感知、理解和管理进行精细评估,以便集中分析不同的情绪智力能力。
Drawing upon multidimensional theories of intelligence, the current paper evaluates if the Geneva Emotional Competence Test (GECo) fits within a higher-order intelligence space and if emotional intelligence (EI) branches predict distinct criteria related to adjustment and motivation. Using a combination of classical and S-1 bifactor models, we find that (a) a first-order oblique and bifactor model provide excellent and comparably fitting representation of an EI structure with self-regulatory skills operating independent of general ability, (b) residualized EI abilities uniquely predict criteria over general cognitive ability as referenced by fluid intelligence, and (c) emotion recognition and regulation incrementally predict grade point average (GPA) and affective engagement in opposing directions, after controlling for fluid general ability and the Big Five personality traits. Results are qualified by psychometric analyses suggesting only emotion regulation has enough determinacy and reliable variance beyond a general ability factor to be treated as a manifest score in analyses and interpretation. Findings call for renewed, albeit tempered, research on EI as a multidimensional intelligence and highlight the need for refined assessment of emotional perception, understanding, and management to allow focused analyses of different EI abilities.
尤里卡!情感理解的概念模型。
DOI: 10.1177/1754073915580601
发表时间: 2016-07
期刊: Emotion review : journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion
影响因子: --
作者:
Castro VL;Cheng Y;Halberstadt AG;Grühn D
通讯作者: Grühn D
DOI: 10.1037/a0025827
发表时间: 2012-10-01
期刊: EMOTION
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Baenziger, Tanja;Mortillaro, Marcello;Scherer, Klaus R.
通讯作者: Scherer, Klaus R.
DOI: 10.1177/2041386610379257
发表时间: 2011-02-01
影响因子: 6.1
作者:
Cote, Stephane;Hideg, Ivona
通讯作者: Hideg, Ivona
DOI: 10.1037/dev0000191
发表时间: 2016-09-01
影响因子: 4
作者:
Cabello, Rosario;Sorrel, Miguel A.;Fernandez-Berrocal, Pablo
通讯作者: Fernandez-Berrocal, Pablo
DOI: 10.1002/job.1962
发表时间: 2015-02-01
影响因子: 6.8
作者:
Desimone, Justin A.;Harms, P. D.;Desimone, Alice J.
通讯作者: Desimone, Alice J.