[Defensive pessimists and coping: the goodness of fit hypothesis].
[Defensive pessimists and coping: the goodness of fit hypothesis].
复制标题
[防御性悲观主义者和应对：拟合优度假设]。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Kodama
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hiroki Hosogoshi;M. Kodama
拟合优度假说（Lazarus & Folkman，1984）认为，在无法控制的情况下，使用情绪集中应对而不是使用问题集中应对是适应性的。本研究旨在探讨防御性悲观主义者（DP）在无法控制的情况下倾向于使用的应对技巧。被试为282名日本大学生，其中61名DP和64名战略乐观主义者（SO）。根据他们报告的回忆压力情况的可控性，他们被分为可控和不可控的亚组。本研究比较了八种应对技巧，分别涉及以情绪为中心的应对和以问题为中心的应对。t检验和方差分析结果表明，在不可控情境下，抑郁症患者倾向于不使用情绪应对，这与拟合优度假设不一致，但也倾向于不使用问题应对，这与拟合优度假设一致。这些结果表明，DP可以自适应地控制自己的行为，使他们不会增加压力更多的不可控的情况下，虽然他们有一个脆弱的压力，很容易感受到，因为他们不能有效地使用情绪为重点的应对。
The goodness of fit hypothesis (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984) posits that it is adaptive to use emotion-focused coping and not to use problem-focused coping in uncontrollable situations. This study examines the coping skills that defensive pessimists (DPs) tend to use in uncontrollable situations. The participants were 282 Japanese college students, from which 61 DPs and 64 strategic optimists (SOs) were identified. Based on the controllability they reported about recalled stress situations, they were classified into controllable or uncontrollable subgroups. Eight coping skills, which are concerned with emotion-focused or problem-focused coping, were compared. T-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that DPs in uncontrollable situations tended not to use emotion-focused coping, which is not consistent with the goodness of fit hypothesis, but they also tended not to use problem-focused coping, which is consistent with the hypothesis. These results imply that DPs can control their behavior adaptively so they do not increase stress more in uncontrollable situations, although they have a vulnerability to feel stress easily because they can not use emotion-focused coping effectively.
影响因子：
5
作者：
MATTLIN, JA;WETHINGTON, E;KESSLER, RC
通讯作者：
KESSLER, RC