The distinctive sequelae of children's coping with interparental conflict: Testing the reformulated emotional security theory.
The distinctive sequelae of children's coping with interparental conflict: Testing the reformulated emotional security theory.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1037/dev0000170
复制
发表时间:
2016-10
影响因子:
4
通讯作者:
Cicchetti, Dante
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Davies, Patrick T.;Martin, Meredith J.;Sturge-Apple, Melissa L.;Ripple, Michael T.;Cicchetti, Dante
Two studies tested hypotheses about the distinctive psychological consequences of children’s patterns of responding to interparental conflict. In Study 1, 174 preschool children (M = 4.0 years) and their mothers participated in a cross-sectional design. In Study 2, 243 preschool children (M = 4.6 years) and their parents participated in two annual measurement occasions. Across both studies, multiple informants assessed children’s psychological functioning. Guided by the reformulated version of emotional security theory, behavioral observations of children’s coping with interparental conflict assessed their tendencies to exhibit four patterns based on their function in defusing threat: secure (i.e., efficiently address direct instances of threat), mobilizing (i.e., react to potential threat and social opportunities), dominant (i.e., directly defeat threat), and demobilizing (i.e., reduce salience as a target of hostility). As hypothesized, each profile predicted unique patterns of adjustment. Greater security was associated with lower levels of internalizing and externalizing symptoms and greater social competence, whereas higher dominance was associated with externalizing problems and extraversion. In contrast, mobilizing patterns of reactivity predicted more problems with self-regulation, internalizing symptoms, externalizing difficulties, but also greater extraversion. Finally, higher levels of demobilizing reactivity were linked with greater internalizing problems and lower extraversion but also better self-regulation.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Cummings EM;George MR;McCoy KP;Davies PT
通讯作者:
Davies PT
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Davies, Patrick T.;Sturge-Apple, Melissa L.;Cummings, E. Mark
通讯作者:
Cummings, E. Mark
影响因子:
4
作者:
Davies, Patrick T.;Cicchetti, Dante;Sturge-Apple, Melissa L.
通讯作者:
Sturge-Apple, Melissa L.
影响因子:
8.2
作者:
Del Giudice, Marco;Ellis, Bruce J.;Shirtcliff, Elizabeth A.
通讯作者:
Shirtcliff, Elizabeth A.
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Davies, PT;Forman, EM
通讯作者:
Forman, EM