Study on the Unsafe Acts and Education Function in Coal Mine Accidents Caused by Rescue
Study on the Unsafe Acts and Education Function in Coal Mine Accidents Caused by Rescue
复制标题
煤矿救援事故中的不安全行为及教育作用研究
DOI：
10.12973/eurasia.2017.01059a
复制
发表时间：
2017-09
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jiang W
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jiang Wei;Zhu Zhi-Ming;Xiang Yuan-Chi;Jiang W
选取1981 - 2011年我国69起煤矿救援事故，重点分析导致煤矿救援事故的直接不安全行为和高频不安全行为。可以得出两个结论。结论一是造成煤矿救护事故的直接不安全行为有五类：不按规定佩戴呼吸器、不按瓦斯检测要求、救护人员能力差、技术措施不到位、违反指挥。前两者所占比例较大，两者之和为57.97%，超过一半。结论二是在所有相关不安全行为中，有19类高频不安全行为具有统计学意义，其中5类高频不安全行为因其发生频率较高而显著：救援时不戴呼吸器、井下救援过程中使用呼吸器交谈、未动态检测井下气体成分、未携带备用呼吸器、未对设备进行预检。分析结果可用于教育员工和学生。
This paper selects 69 coal mine rescue accidents from 1981 to 2011 in China, focusing on direct unsafe acts and high-frequency unsafe acts that lead to coal mine rescue accidents. Two conclusions can be drawn. The first conclusion is that there are five categories of direct unsafe acts that cause coal mine rescue accidents: not wearing respirators as required, not following the gas detection requirements, the poor abilities of the ambulance crew, technical measures not in place, and the violation of commanding. The first two has a larger proportion, as their sum is 57.97%, more than half. The second conclusion is that out of all relevant unsafe acts, nineteen categories of high-frequency unsafe acts are statistically significant, and 5 types are well-marked due to their higher frequency: not wearing respirators when rescuing, talking through respirator in the underground rescue process, not testing underground gas composition dynamically, not carrying a spare respirator, no pro-examination of the equipment. The analysis results can be used to educate employees and students.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
Journal of Jiyuan Vocational and Technical College
影响因子：
--
作者：
Shi Shaoqin
通讯作者：
Shi Shaoqin
DOI：
10.1016/j.dss.2004.04.014
发表时间：
2005-11
期刊：
Decis. Support Syst.
影响因子：
--
作者：
Nadia Papamichail;S. French
通讯作者：
Nadia Papamichail;S. French
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1991
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
T. Drabek;G. J. Hoetmer
通讯作者：
T. Drabek;G. J. Hoetmer
影响因子：
6.1
作者：
J. Wybo;K. Kowalski
通讯作者：
J. Wybo;K. Kowalski
影响因子：
8.3
作者：
Donahue, AK;Joyce, PG
通讯作者：
Joyce, PG