Towards an Inventive Ethics of Carefull Risk: Unsettling Research Through DIY Academic Archiving

Towards an Inventive Ethics of Carefull Risk: Unsettling Research Through DIY Academic Archiving
复制标题

迈向谨慎风险的创新伦理:通过 DIY 学术归档进行令人不安的研究

DOI:
10.1080/08164649.2021.2018991
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
0.7
通讯作者:
Moore N
Moore N
中科院分区:
法学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Moore N

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在本文中,我们呼吁对定性研究采取谨慎风险的创造性伦理。虽然方法论实验在整个社会科学领域受到广泛欢迎,但很少有人谈论伦理原则和实践的创新。我们认为研究伦理是一种“发明的传统”(Hobsbawm 2012),它已成为毫无疑问的惯例。我们将定性研究数据的归档和重用视为一个具有挑战性但又引人注目的方法创新场所,其中道德考虑往往成为不可逾越的障碍。鉴于数据未来的使用未知,以及销毁数据以保护研究参与者的承诺,对知情同意和匿名的道德担忧似乎因共享数据的呼吁而消失了。我们将社区档案、女权主义和酷儿档案工作者以及档案理论的工作作为研究人员发展档案想象的生成场所。我们讲述了我们如何通过创建“DIY 学术档案”(一个数字开放获取研究档案)来扰乱道德实践,Clayoquot Lives:一个生态女权主义故事网(https://clayoquotlives.sps.ed.ac.uk/)。针对规避风险的家长式研究文化,我们认为护理总是涉及风险。一种创造性的谨慎风险的女权主义伦理可以为新的伦理研究提供资源,通过拥抱谨慎数据的风险来重新构想研究。
In this article, we call for an inventive ethics of care-full risk for qualitative research. While methodological experimentation is widely welcomed across the social sciences, there is little talk of innovation in ethical principles and practice. We argue that research ethics is an ‘invented tradition’ (Hobsbawm 2012), which has become unquestioned convention. We take up the archiving and reuse of qualitative research data as a challenging, yet compelling, site of methodological innovation, where ethical considerations often appear as an insurmountable barrier. Ethical concerns about informed consent and anonymity, given unknown future use of data, and commitments to destroying data to protect research participants, appear undone by calls to share data. We take up the work of community archives, feminist and queer archivists and archival theory, as generative sites for developing an archival imaginary for researchers. We recount how we came to unsettle ethical practice through creating a ‘DIY academic archive’, a digital open access research archive,Clayoquot Lives: An Ecofeminist Story Web(https://clayoquotlives.sps.ed.ac.uk/). Against a paternalistic research culture of risk avoidance, we argue that care always involves risk. An inventive feminist ethic of care-full risk can resource new ethical research, reimagining research by embracing the risk of caring for data.
伦理与女权主义研究:理论与实践
DOI: 10.4135/9781849209090.n1
发表时间: 2012
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Edwards;M. Mauthner
通讯作者: M. Mauthner
DOI: --
发表时间: 2019
影响因子: --
作者:
Tonia Sutherland
通讯作者: Tonia Sutherland
DOI: 10.1007/s10767-009-9056-x
发表时间: 2009
期刊: International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society IJPS
影响因子: --
作者:
Alison Landsberg
通讯作者: Alison Landsberg
DOI: 10.29085/9781783301836
发表时间: 2017
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Rice;John Southall
通讯作者: John Southall
方法创新和研究伦理:紧张的力量还是和谐的力量?
DOI: 10.1177/1468794112455042
发表时间: 2013
影响因子: 3.6
作者:
M. Nind;R. Wiles;Andrew. Bengry;G. Crow
通讯作者: G. Crow