Towards responsive energy governance: Lessons from a holistic analysis of energy access in Uganda and Zambia
Towards responsive energy governance: Lessons from a holistic analysis of energy access in Uganda and Zambia
复制标题
实现响应式能源治理：乌干达和赞比亚能源获取整体分析的经验教训
DOI：
10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111934
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
9
通讯作者：
Stritzke S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Stritzke S
尽管国家和国际社会不断努力，但撒哈拉以南非洲的电气化率仍然很低。善治是将这些努力转化为切实改善能源供应的关键。然而，由于涉及众多利益攸关方及其动态的体制环境，评估能源获取治理的质量具有挑战性。本文设计了一种新的，全面的分析方法来评估能源获取治理的基础上三种数据收集方法：定性文件分析（QDA），半结构化的利益相关者访谈和封闭式调查。它按照沿着六项指标评估能源获取治理。将这种方法应用于乌干达和赞比亚以前未研究过的能源获取治理案例，使我们能够归纳出一种新的模型，说明不同善治指标之间的相互依赖关系。报告指出，虽然各项指标之间存在着多种反馈回路，但基本的法治和透明度标准是问责制和包容性的重要先决条件，而问责制和包容性反过来又能提高能源获取治理的效率，并最终提高其应对能力。特别是对于乌干达和赞比亚，我们的分析揭示了所有六项治理指标的缺陷，阻碍了电气化工作。关键的杠杆包括完善监管框架，提高透明度，设计利益攸关方之间有意义的互动，以促进能源获取治理的包容性和响应性。
Electrification rates in sub-Saharan Africa are low despite increasing national and international efforts. Good governance is key to translate these efforts into tangible energy access improvements. However, evaluating the quality of energy access governance is challenging due to the multitude of stakeholders involved and its dynamic institutional environment. This paper designs a novel, holistic analytical approach to assess energy access governance based on three data collection methods: Qualitative Document Analysis (QDA), semi-structured stakeholder interviews and closed surveys. It assesses energy access governance along six indicators. Applying this approach to the previously unstudied cases of energy access governance in Uganda and Zambia allows us to induce a new model of the type of interdependencies between different indicators of good governance. It suggests that while a multitude of feedback loops between indicators exist, basic rule of law and transparency standards are critical prerequisites for accountability and inclusiveness, which in turn foster efficacy and, ultimately, responsiveness of energy access governance. For Uganda and Zambia specifically, our analyses reveal shortcomings across all six governance indicators, hampering electrification efforts. Key levers include completing regulatory frameworks, improving transparency, and designing meaningful interactions between stakeholders to foster inclusiveness, and responsiveness of energy access governance.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5.5
作者：
Philipp A. Trotter
通讯作者：
Philipp A. Trotter
赞比亚农村电气化：政策和制度分析
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Charles Moonga Haanyika
通讯作者：
Charles Moonga Haanyika
调查政策流程：治理分析框架 (GAF)
DOI：
10.7892/boris.68343
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
Institutions & Transition Economics: Firm Governance eJournal
影响因子：
--
作者：
Marc Hufty
通讯作者：
Marc Hufty
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Carlisle, Keith;Gruby, Rebecca L.
通讯作者：
Gruby, Rebecca L.
对权力的期望：加纳和乌干达的国家建设政治和电力供应
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
L. Maclean;C. Gore;Jennifer N. Brass;Elizabeth Baldwin
通讯作者：
Elizabeth Baldwin