Can Jurors Free Themselves from Retributive Objectives?
Can Jurors Free Themselves from Retributive Objectives?
复制标题
陪审员可以摆脱报复性目标吗？
DOI：
10.1007/s12646-011-0079-9
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
T.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Watamura;E.;Wakebe;T.;Maeda;T.
我们检验了外行公民惩罚决定模型中有意识的自我纠正过程可以抑制报应目标的假设，即报应目标是他们本能的缺省目标。在两个实验中，我们测试了忽略惩罚目标的指令是否可以消除有关犯罪严重性的信息对惩罚严厉程度的影响。如果报应目标能够被抑制，指令将消除信息对惩罚力度的影响。然而，信息影响的持久性将意味着报应目标不会受到抑制。结果表明，指令消除了信息对犯罪严重性的影响，但几乎不能降低信息对犯罪严重性的影响。我们的结论是，当抑制报复性目标会导致更轻的惩罚时，自我纠正不能抑制报复性目标。
We examined the hypothesis that the conscious self-correction process in the models of lay citizens’ determination of punishment could inhibit the retributive goal that was their instinctive default objective. In two experiments, we tested whether an instruction to ignore the retributive goal could eliminate the influence of information about the seriousness of the crime on the severity of the punishment. If the retributive goal can be inhibited, the instruction would eliminate the information’s influence on the punishment’s severity. However, the persistence of the information’s influence would mean that the retributive goal is not inhibited. The result showed that the instruction eliminated the influence of information that decreased the crime’s seriousness but could barely reduce the influence of information that increased the seriousness. We concluded that self-correction cannot inhibit the retributive goal when its inhibition would lead to a more lenient punishment.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Carlsmith, KM;Darley, JM;Robinson, PH
通讯作者：
Robinson, PH
道德决策过程的神经认知模型：对研究和实践的影响。
DOI：
10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.737
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
The Journal of applied psychology
影响因子：
--
作者：
Scott J. Reynolds
通讯作者：
Scott J. Reynolds
公众将少年犯移交成人法庭意愿的法律和种族因素
影响因子：
5.5
作者：
Stephen M. Feiler;J. Sheley
通讯作者：
J. Sheley
人们作为直觉检察官：社会控制目标对责任归属的影响
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
P. Tetlock;P. S. Visser;Ramadhar Singh;Mark Polifroni;Amanda L Scott;S. Elson;P. Mazzocco;Phillip Rescober
通讯作者：
Phillip Rescober
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Richard C. McCorkle
通讯作者：
Richard C. McCorkle