Evaluation of pushing out of children from all English state schools: Administrative data cohort study of children receiving social care and their peers.
Evaluation of pushing out of children from all English state schools: Administrative data cohort study of children receiving social care and their peers.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105582
复制
发表时间：
2022-05
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
Gilbert, Ruth
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jay, Matthew A.;Mc Grath-Lone, Louise;De Stavola, Bianca;Gilbert, Ruth
关键词：
驱逐（off-rolling）是指学生被非法驱逐出学校。那些接受儿童社会关怀（CSC）服务（有需要的儿童（CiN），儿童保护计划（CPPs）或照顾（CLA））的人被认为风险更高，但有限的证据阻碍了对这一现象的理解。推出的程度可以从行政数据中的不登记情况推断出来。估计整个中学（11 - 16岁，直到11年级）未入学儿童的比例，并探索CSC历史与10/11年级未入学之间的关系。2011/12和2012/13学年，英国公立学校7年级（11/12岁）的学生人数为100万。我们估计了8至11年级未入学儿童的比例，按CSC历史分类。我们用回归模型评估了CSC历史与10/11年未入学之间的关系。在没有CSC病史的儿童中，3.8%在11年级前有≥1年未入组。这在有CiN（8.1%）、CPP（9.4%）或CLA（10.4%）病史的患者中更高。有CLA病史的患者在10/11年未入组的几率高于未暴露的患者（OR 4.76, 95% CI 4.49-5.05），以及有CPP病史（3.60,3.39-3.81）和CiN病史（2.53,2.49-2.58）的患者。特殊教育需求的历史进一步增加了未入学的几率，包括在混杂因素调整后。研究结果表明，有CSC病史的儿童比没有CSC病史的儿童更容易被学校开除，尤其是那些有特殊教育需求的儿童。有社会关怀史的儿童更有可能失学。那些有特殊教育需要和残疾的人同样面临更大的风险。需要进行法律和监管改革，以保护他们的受教育权。仔细使用行政数据可以帮助识别风险更大的儿童。
Pushing out (off-rolling) occurs where pupils are illegally excluded from school. Those receiving children's social care (CSC) services (children in need (CiN), on child protection plans (CPPs) or looked after (CLA)) are thought to be at increased risk, but limited evidence inhibits understanding of this phenomenon. The extent of pushing out can be inferred from non-enrolment in administrative data. To estimate proportions of children not enrolled across secondary school (aged 11–16, up to year 11) and to explore the association between CSC history and non-enrolment in year 10/11. >1 M pupils in year 7 (aged 11/12) in English state schools, 2011/12 and 2012/13. We estimated the proportion of children not enrolled across years 8 to 11, disaggregated by CSC history. We assessed with regression modelling the association between CSC history and non-enrolment in years 10/11. Of children without CSC history, 3.8% had ≥1 year not enrolled by year 11. This was higher in those with a history CiN (8.1%), CPP (9.4%) or CLA (10.4%) status. The odds of non-enrolment in years 10/11 were higher among those with CLA history vs non-exposed peers (OR 4.76, 95% CI 4.49–5.05) as well as in those with CPP history (3.60, 3.39–3.81) and CiN history (2.53, 2.49–2.58). History of special educational needs further increased non-enrolment odds, including after confounder adjustment. Findings imply that children with CSC history are more likely to be pushed out from school than children without, especially those with special educational needs. Children with a history of social care are more likely to be unenrolled from school. Those with special educational needs and disability are likewise more at risk. Legal and regulatory reform is required to protect their right to education. Careful use of administrative data can help identify children more at risk.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Emmott, Emily H.;Jay, Matthew A.;Woodman, Jenny
通讯作者：
Woodman, Jenny
影响因子：
5
作者：
FELDMAN, JJ;MAKUC, DM;CORNONIHUNTLEY, J
通讯作者：
CORNONIHUNTLEY, J
影响因子：
5.1
作者：
GUTZWILLER, F;LAVECCHIA, C;WIETLISBACH, V
通讯作者：
WIETLISBACH, V
影响因子：
5.2
作者：
Jay, Matthew A.;Gilbert, Ruth
通讯作者：
Gilbert, Ruth
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Anders, Jake;Green, Francis;Henseke, Golo
通讯作者：
Henseke, Golo