An exploration of crowdsourcing citation screening for systematic reviews.
An exploration of crowdsourcing citation screening for systematic reviews.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/jrsm.1252
复制
发表时间:
2017-09
影响因子:
9.8
通讯作者:
Wallace BC
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mortensen ML;Adam GP;Trikalinos TA;Kraska T;Wallace BC
Systematic reviews are increasingly used to inform health care decisions, but are expensive to produce. We explore the use of crowdsourcing (distributing tasks to untrained workers via the web) to reduce the cost of screening citations. We used Amazon Mechanical Turk as our platform and 4 previously conducted systematic reviews as examples. For each citation, workers answered 4 or 5 questions that were equivalent to the eligibility criteria. We aggregated responses from multiple workers into an overall decision to include or exclude the citation using 1 of 9 algorithms and compared the performance of these algorithms to the corresponding decisions of trained experts. The most inclusive algorithm (designating a citation as relevant if any worker did) identified 95% to 99% of the citations that were ultimately included in the reviews while excluding 68% to 82% of irrelevant citations. Other algorithms increased the fraction of irrelevant articles excluded at some cost to the inclusion of relevant studies. Crowdworkers completed screening in 4 to 17 days, costing $460 to $2220, a cost reduction of up to 88% compared to trained experts. Crowdsourcing may represent a useful approach to reducing the cost of identifying literature for systematic reviews.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
16.8
作者:
Silvertown, Jonathan
通讯作者:
Silvertown, Jonathan
影响因子:
15.8
作者:
Bastian H;Glasziou P;Chalmers I
通讯作者:
Chalmers I
影响因子:
5.1
作者:
Goodchild, Michael F.;Glennon, J. Alan
通讯作者:
Glennon, J. Alan
影响因子:
22.4
作者:
FLEISS, JL
通讯作者:
FLEISS, JL
DOI:
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x
发表时间:
2008-09-21
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Lintott, Chris J.;Schawinski, Kevin;Vandenberg, Jan
通讯作者:
Vandenberg, Jan