Informal modes of social support among residents of the rural American West during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Informal modes of social support among residents of the rural American West during the COVID-19 pandemic.
复制标题
COVID-19 大流行期间美国西部农村居民的非正式社会支持模式。
DOI：
10.1111/ruso.12507
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
Farrell,Justin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
McConnell,Kathryn;Mueller,JTom;Merdjanoff,AlexisA;Burow,PaulBerne;Farrell,Justin
在COVID-19疫情爆发的第一年，美国政府安全网计划的联邦支出大幅增加。尽管有如此空前的支出，但政府的安全网因未能完全满足许多家庭的需求而受到广泛批评。灾难研究表明，非正式的社会支持模式往往出现在混乱时期，如大流行的第一年。然而，正式的政府计划和非正式的支持的使用很少检查相对于彼此，导致家庭如何应对灾害影响和金融冲击的不完整的图片。这项研究比较了美国西部农村地区非正式社会支持与正式政府计划使用情况的估计，并利用了2020年夏季进行的快速反应调查和2021年当前人口调查年度社会和经济补充（CPS-ASEC）的数据。我们发现，非正式的社会支持系统，总的来说，使用几乎一样广泛的长期政府计划。我们的研究结果强调了人与人之间的援助的关键作用，例如在破坏性灾害期间农村家庭之间分享财政资源。常规和标准化的数据收集这些非正式的支持行为，可以改善未来的灾害研究和政策反应，特别是在农村人口。
During the first year of the COVID‐19 pandemic, federal spending on government safety net programs in the United States increased dramatically. Despite this unparalleled spending, government safety nets were widely critiqued for failing to fully meet many households' needs. Disaster research suggests thatinformalmodes of social support often emerge during times of disruption, such as the first year of the pandemic. However, use of formal government programs and informal support are rarely examined relative to each other, resulting in an incomplete picture of how households navigate disaster impacts and financial shocks. This study compares estimates of informal social support to formal government program use in the rural U.S. West, drawing on data from a rapid response survey fielded during the summer of 2020 and the 2021 Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey (CPS‐ASEC). We find that informal social support systems were, on aggregate, used almost as extensively as long‐standing government programs. Our findings highlight the critical role of person‐to‐person assistance, such as sharing financial resources, among rural households during a disruptive disaster period. Routine and standardized data collection on these informal support behaviors could improve future disaster research and policy responses, especially among rural populations.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Clark, Eva;Fredricks, Karla;Weatherhead, Jill
通讯作者：
Weatherhead, Jill
美国安全网的周期性
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
M. Bitler;H. Hoynes;John Iselin
通讯作者：
John Iselin
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Hawkins, Robert L.;Maurer, Katherine
通讯作者：
Maurer, Katherine
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
J. of the Japanese History Vol.Feb.
影响因子：
--
作者：
T.Aizawa;K.Kondoh;M.Ikezawa;原 正一郎;Shoichiro Hara
通讯作者：
Shoichiro Hara
为什么安全网可能无法有效应对 COVID-19
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Bitler;H. Hoynes;D. Schanzenbach
通讯作者：
D. Schanzenbach