Family Socioeconomic Status and Children's Screen Time.
Family Socioeconomic Status and Children's Screen Time.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/jomf.12834
复制
发表时间：
2022-08
影响因子：
6
通讯作者：
Fomby, Paula
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mollborn, Stefanie;Limburg, Aubrey;Pace, Jennifer;Fomby, Paula
这项混合方法研究检查了高社会经济地位（SES）儿童的数字技术使用是否符合同期儿科指南，与低社会经济地位儿童相比如何，以及为什么分析显示，高社会经济地位儿童的技术使用远远超过儿科建议。2013年美国儿科学会（AAP）指南建议限制儿童的“屏幕时间”。社会经济地位较高的家庭倾向于遵循指导方针，但数字技术的使用-同时是一种健康行为和建立人力资本的途径-具有复杂的影响。定量分析提供了社会阶层与9至13岁儿童的技术时间（包括电视），设备访问和养育规则之间关系的新的全国代表性估计（2014 PSID儿童发展补充，N = 427）。定性分析77个纵向高SES家长访谈阐述了解释过程。社会经济地位较高的儿童与其他儿童一样频繁地使用技术，并且超过了建议。然而，他们的设备访问、活动和遵守规则的机构与其他人不同。定性分析揭示了有助于解释这些发现的过程：父母对技术的矛盾心理和专家指导缺席或不切实际的看法，以及儿童行使代理权使用技术，通过“协调培养”的养育方式，导致更高的SES个人主义养育实践，支持儿童增加非电视技术的使用。与儿童技术使用相关的文化和结构正在发生变化，分类规范和理解正在出现，以围绕养育子女建立相关的基于阶级的区别。
This mixed‐methods study examined whether higher‐socioeconomic status (SES) children's digital technology use adhered to contemporaneous pediatric guidelines, how it compared to lower‐SES children, and why, as analyses showed, higher‐SES children's technology use far exceeded pediatric recommendations. 2013 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines recommended limited “screen time” for children. Higher SES families tend to follow guidelines, but digital technology use—simultaneously a health behavior and a pathway for building human capital—has complex implications. Quantitative analyses provide new nationally representative estimates of the relationship between social class and 9‐ to 13‐year‐old children's technology time (including television), device access, and parenting rules (2014 PSID Child Development Supplement, N = 427). Qualitative analyses of 77 longitudinal higher‐SES parent interviews articulated explanatory processes. Higher‐SES children used technology as frequently as others and in excess of recommendations. Their device access, activities, and agency in adhering to rules, however, differed from others. Qualitative analysis uncovered processes that helped explain these findings: parents' ambivalence about technology and perception that expert guidance is absent or unrealistic, and children's exercise of agency to use technology facilitated by “concerted cultivation” parenting styles, led to higher‐SES individualistic parenting practices that supported children's increased non‐television technology use. Cultures and structures related to children's technology use are in flux, and classed norms and understandings are emerging to construct relevant class‐based distinctions around parenting.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2
作者：
Fomby P;Goode JA;Truong-Vu KP;Mollborn S
通讯作者：
Mollborn S
影响因子：
6
作者：
Elliott, Sinikka;Bowen, Sarah
通讯作者：
Bowen, Sarah
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Downey, Douglas B.;Gibbs, Benjamin G.
通讯作者：
Gibbs, Benjamin G.
DOI：
10.1007/978-1-4419-7261-3_4
发表时间：
2011-01-01
期刊：
HANDBOOK OF THE SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH, ILLNESS, AND HEALING: A BLUEPRINT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
影响因子：
--
作者：
Freese, Jeremy;Lutfey, Karen
通讯作者：
Lutfey, Karen
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
Cheadle, Jacob E.;Amato, Paul R.
通讯作者：
Amato, Paul R.