Factors Associated With Home Visits in a 5-Year Study of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Survivors.
Factors Associated With Home Visits in a 5-Year Study of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Survivors.
复制标题
DOI:
10.4037/ajcc2020966
复制
发表时间:
2020-11-01
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Dinglas VD
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Friedman LA;Young DL;Nelliot A;Colantuoni E;Mendez-Tellez PA;Needham DM;Dinglas VD
Participant retention is vital for longitudinal studies. Home visits may increase retention, but little is known about which subset of patients they may be useful for. To evaluate patient-related variables associated with home visits. In a 5-year longitudinal multi-site prospective study of 195 ARDS survivors, in-person assessments were conducted at a research clinic; home visits were offered if participants could not attend the clinic. Using multivariable random-intercept logistic regression models, we evaluated the association between having a home visit and prior follow-up visit status and baseline and in-hospital patient variables. In a subsequent regression model adjusted for these variables, we then evaluated the association of the patient’s post-hospital clinical status with home visits. Participants had a median age of 49 years, were 44% female, and 58% white. The following (adjusted odds ratio; 95% confidence interval) had independent associations with home visits: age (per year: 1.03; 1.00, 1.05), prior incomplete visit (2.46; 1.44, 4.19), and prior home visit (8.24; 4.57, 14.86). After adjustment for prior visit status and participants’ baseline and hospitalization variables, the following post-hospital patient outcomes variables were associated with subsequent home visit: instrumental activities of daily living (≥2 vs <2 dependencies: 2.32; 1.29, 4.17), EQ-5D utility score (per 0.1 decrease: 1.15; 1.02, 1.30), and 6-minute walk distance (per 10% decrease in percent predicted distance: 1.50; 1.26, 1.79). Home visits were important for retaining study participants who were older and more physically impaired, helping reduce selection bias from excluding such participants.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Kelmenson DA;Held N;Allen RR;Quan D;Burnham EL;Clark BJ;Ho PM;Kiser TH;Vandivier RW;Moss M
通讯作者:
Moss M
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Fan E;Dowdy DW;Colantuoni E;Mendez-Tellez PA;Sevransky JE;Shanholtz C;Himmelfarb CR;Desai SV;Ciesla N;Herridge MS;Pronovost PJ;Needham DM
通讯作者:
Needham DM
影响因子:
4.3
作者:
Haines, Kimberley J.;Quasim, Tara;McPeake, Joanne
通讯作者:
McPeake, Joanne
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Coday, M;Boutin-Foster, C;Somes, GW
通讯作者:
Somes, GW
影响因子:
4.5
作者:
Aceituno, Anna M.;Stanhope, Kaitlyn K.;Leon, Juan S.
通讯作者:
Leon, Juan S.