A Review of Processes for Removing Antibiotics from Breeding Wastewater.

A Review of Processes for Removing Antibiotics from Breeding Wastewater.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3390/ijerph18094909
复制
发表时间:
2021-05-05
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Gong H
Gong H
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Huang A;Yan M;Lin J;Xu L;Gong H;Gong H

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

由于抗生素的广泛应用、难以去除以及对水生环境和人类的有害影响,抗生素污染已成为一个日益严重的问题。由于养殖场处理系统不发达,养殖废水是水环境中抗生素最重要的来源之一。建立有效的养殖废水抗生素去除工艺势在必行。本文综述了养殖废水中抗生素去除的处理方法。详细阐述了人工湿地、生物处理、高级氧化工艺(AOP)、膜技术和组合处理的机理和去除效率,并对各种处理方法的优缺点进行了比较和分析。人工湿地对磺酰胺(SM)、四环素(TC)和喹诺酮(QN)具有较高的去除率。生物处理方法的抗生素去除效率受多种工艺和环境因素影响,而AOPs和联合处理方法具有更好的抗生素去除效果。虽然具有广阔的应用前景,但膜技术在养殖废水抗生素处理中的应用还需要进一步研究。
Antibiotic pollution has become an increasingly serious issue due to the extensive application of antibiotics, their resistance to removal, and the harmful effects on aquatic environments and humans. Breeding wastewater is one of the most important sources of antibiotics in the aquatic environment because of the undeveloped treatment systems in breeding farms. It is imperative to establish an effective antibiotic removal process for breeding wastewater. This paper reviews the treatment methods used to remove antibiotics from breeding wastewater. The mechanisms and removal efficiency of constructed wetlands, biological treatments, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), membrane technology, and combined treatments are explained in detail, and the advantages and disadvantages of the various treatment methods are compared and analyzed. Constructed wetlands have high removal rates for sulfonamide (SM), tetracycline (TC), and quinolone (QN). The antibiotic removal efficiency of biological treatment methods is affected by various processes and environmental factors, whereas AOPs and combined treatment methods have better antibiotic removal effects. Although it has broad application prospects, the application of membrane technology for the treatment of antibiotics in breeding wastewater needs further research.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.073
发表时间: 2019-02-01
影响因子: 8.7
作者:
Lan, Lihua;Kong, Xianwang;Liu, Dezhao
通讯作者: Liu, Dezhao
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-8297-2
发表时间: 2017-02-01
影响因子: 5.8
作者:
Guo, Luchen;Lv, Tao;Dong, Renjie
通讯作者: Dong, Renjie
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136094
发表时间: 2020-03-20
影响因子: 9.8
作者:
Han, Yuefei;Yang, Linyan;Shen, Genxiang
通讯作者: Shen, Genxiang
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.010
发表时间: 2010-10-01
期刊: CHEMOSPHERE
影响因子: 8.8
作者:
Hijosa-Valsero, Maria;Sidrach-Cardona, Ricardo;Becares, Eloy
通讯作者: Becares, Eloy
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137812
发表时间: 2020-06-20
影响因子: 9.8
作者:
Lang, Zhicheng;Zhou, Minghua;Li, Yawei
通讯作者: Li, Yawei