How could you think that?!?!: Understanding intentions to engage in political flaming

How could you think that?!?!: Understanding intentions to engage in political flaming
复制标题

你怎么能这么想?!?!:理解参与政治煽动的意图

DOI:
10.1177/1461444814522947
复制
发表时间:
2015
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
Jay D. Hmielowski
Jay D. Hmielowski
中科院分区:
人文科学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Myiah J. Hutchens;Vincent Cicchirillo;Jay D. Hmielowski

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

传播学者对互联网在促进民主方面的作用既有赞扬,也有质疑。然而,很少有研究调查在线政治讨论空间中的攻击性沟通行为。研究人员进行了两项研究,以调查网络上攻击性讨论行为的使用情况,也被称为“燃烧”。第一项研究对一所大型公立大学的289名本科生进行了调查。研究二利用了对305名经常使用政治博客的人的调查。两项研究的结果都表明,当个人的信仰受到直接挑战时,他们更有可能参与政治斗争。此外,结果表明,无论一个人的身份是已知的还是未知的,都不会影响他们在学生样本中的燃烧意图。在博客用户样本中,我们发现,当身份未知时,直接挑战会增加火焰的意图。最后,我们研究了政治火焰与几个个人层面变量之间的关系。
Communication scholars have both lauded and questioned the Internet’s role in facilitating democracy. However, few studies have examined aggressive communication behavior in online political discussion spaces. Two studies were conducted to examine use of aggressive discussion behaviors online, otherwise known as flaming. Study one utilized a survey of 289 undergraduate students at a large public university. Study two utilized a survey of 305 individuals who frequent political blogs. Results from both studies suggest that individuals are more likely to engage in political flaming when their beliefs are directly challenged. In addition, results indicate that whether an individual’s identity is known or unknown did not influence their intention to flame within the student sample. In the blog-user sample, we found that direct challenges when identities were not known increased intention to flame. Finally, we examine the relationship between political flaming and several individual-level variables.
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1146
发表时间: 1987-12-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
DODGE, KA;COIE, JD
通讯作者: COIE, JD