Verbal working memory and on-line syntactic processing: evidence from self-paced listening.
Verbal working memory and on-line syntactic processing: evidence from self-paced listening.
复制标题
言语工作记忆和在线句法处理：来自自定进度聆听的证据。
DOI：
10.1080/02724980343000170
复制
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Caplan,David
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Waters,GloriaS;Caplan,David
两个实验研究了言语工作记忆标准测试的表现与句法形式的在线构建之间的关系。在实验1中，100名大学生在Daneman和Carpenter（1980）阅读跨度任务的版本上测量了工作记忆，并使用四种句子类型的自定进度听力任务评估了在线句法处理。在实验2中，48名大学生在两个版本的阅读跨度任务和两个其他测试的口头工作记忆的工作记忆进行了测量，和在线句法加工进行了评估，使用自定进度的听力任务与额外的句子类型。在这两个实验中，工作记忆容量与句法更复杂或句法更简单的句子的句法形式的在线构建所需的处理时间增加之间没有关系。结果表明，标准工作记忆测试测量的工作记忆系统的容量并不能决定在线句法加工的效率。它们与用于解析的工作记忆系统至少部分地与传统的工作记忆容量测量方法相分离的观点一致。
Two experiments investigated the relationship between performance on standard tests of verbal working‐memory and the on‐line construction of syntactic form. In Experiment 1, working‐memory was measured in 100 college students on a version of the Daneman and Carpenter (1980) reading‐span task, and online syntactic processing was assessed using a self‐paced listening task with four sentence types. In Experiment 2, working‐memory was measured in 48 college students on two versions of the reading‐span task and two other tests of verbal working‐memory, and on‐line syntactic processing was assessed using the self‐paced listening task with an additional sentence type. In both experiments, there was no relationship between working‐memory capacity and the increase in processing time seen for the on‐line construction of syntactic form for either syntactically more complex or syntactically simpler sentences. The results indicate that the capacity of the working‐memory system that is measured by standard working‐memory tests does not determine the efficiency of on‐line syntactic processing. They are consistent with the view that the working‐memory system used for parsing is at least partially separate from that measured by traditional measures of working‐memory capacity.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Just;P. Carpenter
通讯作者：
M. Just;P. Carpenter
影响因子：
--
作者：
G. Vallar;T. Shallice
通讯作者：
T. Shallice
语法但不可接受的理论
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1996
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
EmbeddingsRichard L. LewisDepartment
通讯作者：
EmbeddingsRichard L. LewisDepartment
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Shah, P;Miyake, A
通讯作者：
Miyake, A