Knowing me, knowing you: perspectives on awareness in autism
Knowing me, knowing you: perspectives on awareness in autism
复制标题
认识我，认识你：对自闭症意识的看法
DOI：
10.1108/jat-09-2015-0025
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Brosnan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
N. Yuill;S. Parsons;J. Good;M. Brosnan
目的-本文的目的是从自闭症研究的不同角度提出重要问题，这些问题来自于自闭症和技术研讨会，该研讨会是esrc资助的自闭症创新技术系列的一部分。设计/方法论/方法-本文着重于技术在理解关于自闭症的不同观点的问题中的作用：谱系上的人如何看待神经典型（没有自闭症的人），反之亦然？作者对目光的使用有何不同？科技如何影响研究内容？作者如何衡量这些内容？人们模仿他人的方式会有什么不同？最后，作者应该如何研究和处理任何差异？调查结果——作者从受邀的谈话和回应中综合了共同的主题。听众的讨论强调了作者考虑人类差异的方式，作者如何理解他人的观点，特别是在研究中使用第三人称和第二人称方法，以及研究人员和利益相关者如何相互接触。原创性/价值——作者认为，对于考虑自闭症患者和神经正常人群在日常环境中如何互动，以及研究人员如何构建他们的研究问题和方法，观点的问题很重要。作者建议，利益相关者和研究人员可以以有利于研究和实践的方式，富有成效地直接参与研究讨论。
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to raise important questions from the different perspectives on autism research that arose from a seminar on autism and technology, held as part of an ESRC-funded series on innovative technologies for autism. Design/methodology/approach – The paper focuses on the roles of technology in understanding questions about different perspectives on autism: how do people on the spectrum see neurotypicals (people without autism) and vice versa?; how do the authors use eye gaze differently from each other?; how might technology influence what is looked at and how the authors measure this?; what differences might there be in how people use imitation of others?; and finally, how should the authors study and treat any differences? Findings – The authors synthesise common themes from invited talks and responses. The audience discussions highlighted the ways in which the authors take account of human variation, how the authors can understand the perspective of another, particularly across third-person and second-person approaches in research, and how researchers and stakeholders engage with each other. Originality/value – The authors argue that the question of perspectives is important for considering how people with autism and neurotypical people interact in everyday contexts, and how researchers frame their research questions and methods. The authors propose that stakeholders and researchers can fruitfully engage directly in discussions of research, in ways that benefit both research and practice.
DOI：
--
发表时间：
--
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
A. F. De;C. Hamilton
通讯作者：
A. F. De;C. Hamilton