Data Subjects' Perspectives on Emotion Artificial Intelligence Use in the Workplace: A Relational Ethics Lens
Data Subjects' Perspectives on Emotion Artificial Intelligence Use in the Workplace: A Relational Ethics Lens
复制标题
数据主体对工作场所情感人工智能使用的看法:关系伦理视角
DOI:
10.1145/3579600
复制
发表时间:
2023
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Andalibi, Nazanin
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Corvite, Shanley;Roemmich, Kat;Rosenberg, Tillie Ilana;Andalibi, Nazanin
The workplace has experienced extensive digital transformation, in part due to artificial intelligence's commercial availability. Though still an emerging technology, emotional artificial intelligence (EAI) is increasingly incorporated into enterprise systems to augment and automate organizational decisions and to monitor and manage workers. EAI use is often celebrated for its potential to improve workers' wellbeing and performance as well as address organizational problems such as bias and safety. Workers subject to EAI in the workplace are data subjects whose data make EAI possible and who are most impacted by it. However, we lack empirical knowledge about data subjects' perspectives on EAI, including in the workplace. To this end, using a relational ethics lens, we qualitatively analyzed 395 U.S. adults' open-ended survey (partly representative) responses regarding the perceived benefits and risks they associate with being subjected to EAI in the workplace. While participants acknowledged potential benefits of being subject to EAI (e.g., employers using EAI to aid their wellbeing, enhance their work environment, reduce bias), a myriad of potential risks overshadowed perceptions of potential benefits. Participants expressed concerns regarding the potential for EAI use to harm their wellbeing, work environment and employment status, and create and amplify bias and stigma against them, especially the most marginalized (e.g., along dimensions of race, gender, mental health status, disability). Distrustful of EAI and its potential risks, participants anticipated conforming to (e.g., partaking in emotional labor) or refusing (e.g., quitting a job) EAI implementation in practice. We argue that EAI may magnify, rather than alleviate, existing challenges data subjects face in the workplace and suggest that some EAI-inflicted harms would persist even if concerns of EAI's accuracy and bias are addressed.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Sato;Makoto
通讯作者:
Makoto
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
影响因子:
--
作者:
Christina N. Harrington;Tawanna R. Dillahunt
通讯作者:
Tawanna R. Dillahunt
DOI:
10.1109/acii.2019.8925440
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
2019 8th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Samiha Samrose;Wenyi Chu;C. He;Yuebai Gao;Syeda Sarah Shahrin;Zhen Bai;Ehsan Hoque
通讯作者:
Ehsan Hoque
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
影响因子:
--
作者:
G. Mark;Shamsi T. Iqbal;M. Czerwinski;Paul Johns
通讯作者:
Paul Johns
DOI:
10.1145/3123024.3123080
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
影响因子:
--
作者:
Wong, Richmond Y.;Mulligan, Deirdre K.;Chuang, John
通讯作者:
Chuang, John