Forced Cohabitation during Coronavirus Lockdown in Italy: A Study on Coping, Stress and Emotions among Different Family Patterns.
Forced Cohabitation during Coronavirus Lockdown in Italy: A Study on Coping, Stress and Emotions among Different Family Patterns.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3390/jcm9123906
复制
发表时间：
2020-12-01
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Avallone F
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mari E;Fraschetti A;Lausi G;Pizzo A;Baldi M;Paoli E;Giannini AM;Avallone F
背景：2020年初，一种新型冠状病毒引起了大流行。3月9日，意大利人民被迫封锁，以防止这种新病毒的传播。这一事件迫使家人和同居者在同一个物理空间中度过一整天甚至几周，与伴侣和孩子以一种与以前截然不同的亲密程度互动。本研究探讨了被迫同居对不同家庭模式、压力、应对策略、时间感知和同居质量评价等方面的影响。方法：通过概率随机抽样在意大利全国招募了1750人。根据封锁情况，设置了在线调查问卷；选择了几个有效的量表，并为参与者的想法包括了一些开放式的项目。结果：三种家庭模式之间的差异有统计学意义。结论：在被迫共同生活期间，儿童的存在和所采取的协作应对策略可以推断出积极的影响；根据有关该主题的文献对结果进行了讨论。
Background: At the beginning of 2020, a pandemic caused by a new strain of coronavirus occurred. On March 9th, the Italian population was forced to lockdown to prevent the spread of this new virus. This event forced families and cohabitants to spend their entire days and weeks in the same physical space, interacting with partners and children with a very different degree of intimacy than in the earlier situation. The present study investigated the effects of being forced to live together on different family patterns, on various dimensions such as stress, coping strategies, time perception and quality evaluation of cohabitation. Method: A total sample consisting of 1750 individuals was recruited through a random sample of probability across the Italian country. Due to the lockdown condition, an online questionnaire was set up; several validated scales were chosen, and some open-ended items were included for the thoughts of the participants. Results: The results showed statistically significant differences between the three family patterns examined. Conclusion: During the forced period of living together, a positive effect could be inferred as given by the presence of children and the collaborative coping strategies that have been adopted; the results have been discussed according to the literature on the topic.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5
作者：
COHEN, S;KAMARCK, T;MERMELSTEIN, R
通讯作者：
MERMELSTEIN, R
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Cohen, Aaron
通讯作者：
Cohen, Aaron
影响因子：
4
作者：
Lowe, Sarah R.;Rhodes, Jean E.;Scoglio, Arielle A. J.
通讯作者：
Scoglio, Arielle A. J.
影响因子：
10.5
作者：
BATEMAN, TS;ORGAN, DW
通讯作者：
ORGAN, DW
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
Pieh C;Budimir S;Probst T
通讯作者：
Probst T