Theorising informality and social embeddedness for the study of informal transport. Lessons from the marshrutka mobility phenomenon
Theorising informality and social embeddedness for the study of informal transport. Lessons from the marshrutka mobility phenomenon
复制标题
为非正规交通研究建立非正规性和社会嵌入理论。
DOI：
10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.01.006
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
6.1
通讯作者：
Wladimir Sgibnev
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Rekhviashvili;Wladimir Sgibnev
本文建立在最近的后结构主义著作的非正式经济实践，最重要的是使用波兰制度主义框架，讨论正式/非正式和市场/非市场的做法在运输部门。本文提出了一个批判性的阅读文学经典的非正式运输，这在很大程度上假设了自然和无处不在的市场。我们说明了如何简化定义的非正式运输边缘化分析重要的经验细节，而且，导致误导性的理论结论。相反，我们分析脱钩非正式和市场，表明正式和非正式的经济实践可以嵌入在不同的社会文化机构。这种理论框架有助于对各种运输选择进行一致的评价和经验性审查，比什凯克和第比利斯的marshrutkamobility现象就证明了这一点。我们将市场化、去嵌入或重新嵌入、正规化和非正规化视为动态、相互依赖和相互冲突的过程。基于这些理由，本文主张对全球南方和全球北方的其他形式的非正规运输（旧的和新兴的）进行批判性的重新评估。
This paper builds upon recent post-structuralist writings on informal economic practices, using most importantly a Polanyian institutionalist framework, to discuss formal/informal and market/non-market practices in the transport sector. The article proposes a critical reading of the literary canon of informal transport, which largely assumes a naturalness and omnipresence of markets. We illustrate how reductionist definitions of informal transport marginalise analytically important empirical detail, and furthermore, lead to misleading theoretical conclusions. In contrast, we analytically de-couple informality and markets, showing that formal and informal economic practices can be embedded in diverse social-cultural institutions. Such a theoretical framework allows for consistent evaluation and empirical examination of transport options, as substantiated by evidence from themarshrutkamobility phenomenon in Bishkek and Tbilisi. We observe marketisation, dis- or re-embedding, formalisation and informalisation as dynamic, inter-dependent and conflictual processes. On these grounds, the article argues for a critical re-appraisal of other forms of informal transport, old and emerging, both in the Global South and the Global North.
DOI：
10.1080/24694452.2015.1123067
发表时间：
2016-01
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
M. Kwan;T. Schwanen
通讯作者：
M. Kwan;T. Schwanen
流动性组合：中亚的 marshrutkas
影响因子：
1.2
作者：
Vozyanov;Andrey (mit Wladimir Sgibnev)
通讯作者：
Andrey (mit Wladimir Sgibnev)