Post-stroke cognitive impairments and responsiveness to motor rehabilitation: A review.

Post-stroke cognitive impairments and responsiveness to motor rehabilitation: A review.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s40141-020-00283-3
复制
发表时间:
2020-12
影响因子:
1.1
通讯作者:
Schaefer SY
Schaefer SY
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
VanGilder JL;Hooyman A;Peterson DS;Schaefer SY

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

本文综述了卒中后认知功能障碍的患病率及其对运动学习环境中治疗干预反应的影响。临床和实验研究已经证实,卒中后认知和运动缺陷可能会阻碍截肢,增加跌倒风险,并影响干预措施的有效性。最近的研究表明,认知缺陷的存在可能在运动恢复中发挥比以前理解的更大的作用。考虑到认知障碍影响运动再学习,中风后运动康复治疗可能受益于正式的神经心理学测试。例如,早期的研究表明,在神经典型的成年人中,认知功能可能是对运动康复的反应性的预测,认知训练可能会改善运动能力。这为在中风后人群中探索这些主题的研究奠定了基础。此外,这些认知障碍影响功能结果的神经基础和程度在很大程度上仍未被探索,需要进一步的调查。
This review discusses the prevalence of cognitive deficits following stroke and their impact on responsiveness to therapeutic intervention within a motor learning context. Clinical and experimental studies have established that post-stroke cognitive and motor deficits may impede ambulation, augment fall risk, and influence the efficacy of interventions. Recent research suggests the presence of cognitive deficits may play a larger role in motor recovery than previously understood. Considering that cognitive impairments affect motor relearning, post-stroke motor rehabilitation therapies may benefit from formal neuropsychological testing. For example, early work suggests that in neurotypical adults, cognitive function may be predictive of responsiveness to motor rehabilitation and cognitive training may improve mobility. This sets the stage for investigations probing these topics in people post-stroke. Moreover, the neural basis for and extent to which these cognitive impairments influence functional outcome remains largely unexplored and require additional investigation.
DOI: 10.1177/1545968317718267
发表时间: 2017-08
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
de Kam D;Roelofs JMB;Bruijnes AKBD;Geurts ACH;Weerdesteyn V
通讯作者: Weerdesteyn V
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.027
发表时间: 2015-03-04
期刊: Neuron
影响因子: 16.2
作者:
Corbetta M;Ramsey L;Callejas A;Baldassarre A;Hacker CD;Siegel JS;Astafiev SV;Rengachary J;Zinn K;Lang CE;Connor LT;Fucetola R;Strube M;Carter AR;Shulman GL
通讯作者: Shulman GL
DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s67184
发表时间: 2014
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Al-Qazzaz NK;Ali SH;Ahmad SA;Islam S;Mohamad K
通讯作者: Mohamad K
DOI: 10.1097/wco.0b013e328315a293
发表时间: 2008-12
影响因子: 4.8
作者:
Bastian AJ
通讯作者: Bastian AJ
DOI: 10.1093/brain/88.2.237
发表时间: 1965-01-01
期刊: BRAIN
影响因子: 14.5
作者:
GESCHWIN.N
通讯作者: GESCHWIN.N