Identity motives and in-group favouritism: a new approach to individual differences in intergroup discrimination.

Identity motives and in-group favouritism: a new approach to individual differences in intergroup discrimination.
复制标题

身份动机和群体内偏袒:群体间歧视中个体差异的新方法。

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2007
影响因子:
5.4
通讯作者:
Natalie J Moncaster
Natalie J Moncaster
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
V. Vignoles;Natalie J Moncaster

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

理论表明,自尊、意义、独特性和归属感等身份动机与群体间歧视有关。实验研究支持的预测,但相关性测试一直受到方法问题的阻碍。使用一种新的方法来测量身份动机,我们比较了预测的个体差异在组内偏爱。70名英国成年人完成了身份动机,英国的身份和积极和消极的特质典型性评级的英国和德国国籍的措施。随着更大的识别,独特性和归属感的动机的强度越来越多地预测内组偏好:与最佳独特性理论相一致,归属动机预测国家内组的积极评级,而独特性动机预测国家外组的负面评级。结果表明,从动机满意度的措施解开的动机强度的措施的价值。
Theories suggest that identity motives for self-esteem, meaning, distinctiveness and belonging are implicated in intergroup discrimination. Experimental studies have supported predictions, but correlational tests have been hindered by methodological problems. Using a new approach to measuring identity motives, we compared predictions of individual differences in in-group favouritism. Seventy British adults completed measures of identity motives, British identification and positive and negative trait typicality ratings of British and German nationalities. With greater identification, the strength of motives for distinctiveness and belonging increasingly predicted in-group favouritism: consistent with optimal distinctiveness theory, the belonging motive predicted positive ratings of the national in-group, whereas the distinctiveness motive predicted negative ratings of the national out-group. Results show the value of disentangling measures of motive strength from measures of motive satisfaction.
DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.57.5.782
发表时间: 1989-11
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
W. Swann;B. Pelham;Douglas S. Krull
通讯作者: W. Swann;B. Pelham;Douglas S. Krull