Solving intergenerational sustainability dilemma through imaginary future generations: A qualitative-deliberative approach
Solving intergenerational sustainability dilemma through imaginary future generations: A qualitative-deliberative approach
复制标题
通过想象的后代解决代际可持续发展困境：定性审议方法
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Tatsuyoshi Saijo
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Y. Nakagawa;Koji Kotani;Yoshio Kamijo;Tatsuyoshi Saijo
当代人影响后代人，而不是反过来。众所周知，这种世代依赖的单向性是气候变化和政府债务积累等许多重要问题的主要原因。这些问题的发生表现为当代人倾向于选择有利于自己利益的行为而不考虑后代人，我们称之为“代际可持续性困境”（ISD）。本文设计并实施了三个人的ISD的审议实验，并研究了如何解决这个困境。一种治疗，“帽的后代”（上限的球员），建议在当前一代的一个人被要求是一个代表从未来没有任何义务。我们对每一代人的决定进行了10分钟的记录讨论进行了一种新颖的定性审议分析，有助于这两点。首先，我们找到了通过审议加强代际可持续性的条件。也就是说，一个组中的一个成员自愿扮演破冰者的角色进行审议和/或上限的球员出现在组中。我们证明，当破冰船和/或上限的球员在审议过程中存在，该集团带来了更多的想法和观点的ISD品种，导致更高的代际可持续性。第二，本研究说明了定性审议分析如何有效地与经济实验相结合，作为一种新的方法来揭示人类行为和偏好的集体决策。
The current generation affects future generations, but not vice versa. This one-way nature of dependence over generations is known to be a main cause for many important problems such as climate change and accumulation of government debts. The occurrence of these problems is characterized by the fact that the current generation tends to choose an action in favor of their benefit without considering future generations, which we call "intergenerational sustainability dilemma (ISD)." This paper designs and implements deliberation experiments of the ISD with a single generation of three people, and examine how the dilemma can be solved. A treatment, "cap of future generations" (capped player), is suggested in which one person in the current generation is asked to be a representative from future without any obligation. We conduct a novel qualitative-deliberative analysis of recorded discussions for 10 minutes of each generation’s decision, contributing to the two points. First, we find the conditions under which intergenerational sustainability is enhanced through deliberations. That is, one member in a group voluntarily plays a role of icebreakers for deliberation and/or a capped player is present in a group. We demonstrate that when an icebreaker and/or a capped player are present during deliberation, the group brings more varieties of ideas and viewpoints for the ISD, leading to higher intergenerational sustainability. Second, this research illustrates how a qualitative-deliberative analysis can be usefully amalgamated with economic experiments as a new methodology to reveal human behaviors and preferences in collective-decision making.
影响因子：
25
作者：
Sharot T;Korn CW;Dolan RJ
通讯作者：
Dolan RJ