Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review.
Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review.
复制标题
国际体育活动问卷的有效性简短形式（IPAQ-SF）：系统评价。
DOI：
10.1186/1479-5868-8-115
复制
发表时间：
2011-10-21
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Stewart SM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lee PH;Macfarlane DJ;Lam TH;Stewart SM
国际身体活动问卷 - 简表 (IPAQ-SF) 已被推荐作为评估身体活动的经济有效的方法。已经进行了几项验证 IPAQ-SF 的研究，得出了不同的结果，但尚未报道这些研究的系统评价。在 PubMed 和 Scopus 中检索了关键词“IPAQ”、“validation”和“validity”。其中包括以英文发表的研究，该研究根据客观身体活动测量设备、双标记水或客观健身测量来验证 IPAQ-SF。本次评价纳入了二十三项验证研究。各研究使用的方法存在很大差异，但结果基本相似。 IPAQ-SF测量的总身体活动水平与客观标准之间的相关性在0.09至0.39之间；没有一个达到文献中可接受的最低标准（客观活动测量设备为 0.50，健身测量为 0.40）。 IPAQ-SF 的剧烈活动或中等活动水平/步行部分与客观标准之间的相关性显示出更大的变异性（-0.18 至 0.76），但有几个部分达到了最低可接受标准。只有六项研究提供了 IPAQ-SF 得出的身体活动水平与客观标准得出的身体活动水平之间的比较。在大多数研究中，IPAQ-SF 高估了体力活动水平 36% 至 173%；一项研究低估了 28%。在大多数研究中，IPAQ-SF 与活动或健康的客观测量之间的相关性低于可接受的标准。此外，IPAQ-SF 通常高估了按照客观标准衡量的体力活动，平均高估了 84%。因此，支持使用 IPAQ-SF 作为相对或绝对体力活动指标的证据很薄弱。
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF) has been recommended as a cost-effective method to assess physical activity. Several studies validating the IPAQ-SF have been conducted with differing results, but no systematic review of these studies has been reported. The keywords "IPAQ", "validation", and "validity" were searched in PubMed and Scopus. Studies published in English that validated the IPAQ-SF against an objective physical activity measuring device, doubly labeled water, or an objective fitness measure were included. Twenty-three validation studies were included in this review. There was a great deal of variability in the methods used across studies, but the results were largely similar. Correlations between the total physical activity level measured by the IPAQ-SF and objective standards ranged from 0.09 to 0.39; none reached the minimal acceptable standard in the literature (0.50 for objective activity measuring devices, 0.40 for fitness measures). Correlations between sections of the IPAQ-SF for vigorous activity or moderate activity level/walking and an objective standard showed even greater variability (-0.18 to 0.76), yet several reached the minimal acceptable standard. Only six studies provided comparisons between physical activity levels derived from the IPAQ-SF and those obtained from objective criterion. In most studies the IPAQ-SF overestimated physical activity level by 36 to 173 percent; one study underestimated by 28 percent. The correlation between the IPAQ-SF and objective measures of activity or fitness in the large majority of studies was lower than the acceptable standard. Furthermore, the IPAQ-SF typically overestimated physical activity as measured by objective criterion by an average of 84 percent. Hence, the evidence to support the use of the IPAQ-SF as an indicator of relative or absolute physical activity is weak.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
Kaleth, Anthony S.;Ang, Dennis C.;Tong, Yan
通讯作者：
Tong, Yan
DOI：
10.1097/00005768-199805000-00021
发表时间：
1998-05-01
期刊：
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
影响因子：
--
作者：
Freedson, PS;Melanson, E;Sirard, J
通讯作者：
Sirard, J
影响因子：
4
作者：
Kurtze, Nanna;Rangul, Vegar;Hustvedt, Bo-Egil
通讯作者：
Hustvedt, Bo-Egil
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
Freedson, PS;Miller, K
通讯作者：
Miller, K
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
Ferguson, Christopher J.
通讯作者：
Ferguson, Christopher J.