RESEARCH ETHICS. Evidence gaps and ethical review of multicenter studies.
RESEARCH ETHICS. Evidence gaps and ethical review of multicenter studies.
复制标题
研究伦理。
DOI:
10.1126/science.aac4872
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Ehrhardt,Stephan
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ervin,Ann-Margret;Taylor,HollyA;Meinert,CurtisL;Ehrhardt,Stephan
Large, multicenter clinical studies are the backbone of evidence-based prevention and healthcare. Ethical review of multicenter research is usually conducted by the institutional review board (IRB) of each participating institution. However, variation in interpretation of regulations by IRBs is common and can have ethical and scientific implications (1, 2). Recent mandates in the United States aim to reduce the administrative burden and to expedite multicenter research by conducting ethical review with a single, central IRB of record (CIRB). Yet the quality of ethical review must not suffer. We characterize current models of ethical review in the United States and identify research gaps that must be addressed before such policies are instituted.Multicenter studies are designed to expedite participant enrollment but are hampered by the current review process. Requests from disparate IRBs to modify study procedures and consent forms may prevent participation of affected centers or require resubmissions to IRBs of all participating centers. Exclusion of clinical centers or modifications to procedures may unequally distribute the benefits and burdens of research.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5
作者:
S. Nojiri;S. Odintsov
通讯作者:
S. Nojiri;S. Odintsov
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. Phipps;A. Nasim;D. Miller
通讯作者:
J. Phipps;A. Nasim;D. Miller
DOI:
10.1086/413216
发表时间:
1983
期刊:
The Quarterly Review of Biology
影响因子:
--
作者:
H. Bernstein;Henry C. Byerly;Frederick A. Hopf;Richard A. Michod;G. Krishna Vemulapalli
通讯作者:
G. Krishna Vemulapalli
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
L. Breimer;T. Lindahl
通讯作者:
T. Lindahl
影响因子:
3.2
作者:
R. S. Cole
通讯作者:
R. S. Cole