Proactive versus reactive task-set inhibition: Evidence from flanker compatibility effects
Proactive versus reactive task-set inhibition: Evidence from flanker compatibility effects
复制标题
主动与被动任务组抑制：来自侧翼兼容性效应的证据
DOI：
10.3758/bf03194131
复制
发表时间：
2007
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
E. Ruthruff
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
David F. Kuhns;Mei;E. Ruthruff
两个收敛测试被用来确定人们是否主动抑制最近执行的任务时切换到新的任务。采用任务线索范式。在每一次试验中，相关的刺激伴随着属于前一次试验（滞后1）或更远的试验（滞后21）上执行的任务的侧翼。如果当切换到另一个任务时，刚刚执行的任务被抑制，并且这种抑制在试验中下降，那么lag 1侧翼的侧翼干扰应该比lag 21侧翼的小。实验1采用了Hübner、德赖斯巴赫、Haider和Kluwe（2003）的方法，但未能证实这一预测。实验2证实了预测，但是，使用修改后的设计，以提供更大的激励任务集抑制。研究结果提供了证据，抑制可以主动应用，以减少被放弃的任务的能力，干扰其他任务的性能。
Two converging tests were used to determine whether people proactively inhibit recently performed tasks when switching to new tasks. A task-cuing paradigm was used. In each trial, the relevant stimulus was accompanied by flankers belonging either to the task performed on the immediately preceding trial (lag 1) or a more distant trial (lag 21). If the just-performed task is inhibited when switching to another task, and this inhibition declines across trials, then flanker interference should be smaller with lag 1 flankers than with lag 21 flankers. Experiment 1, following the methods of Hübner, Dreisbach, Haider, and Kluwe (2003), failed to confirm this prediction. The prediction was confirmed in Experiment 2, however, using a design modified to provide greater incentives for task-set inhibition. The results provide evidence that inhibition can be applied proactively, to reduce the ability of an abandoned task to interfere with the performance of other tasks.
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Mayr, U;Keele, SW
通讯作者：
Keele, SW