Second order dimensionality reduction using minimum and maximum mutual information models.
Second order dimensionality reduction using minimum and maximum mutual information models.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002249
复制
发表时间:
2011-10
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Sharpee TO
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fitzgerald JD;Rowekamp RJ;Sincich LC;Sharpee TO
Conventional methods used to characterize multidimensional neural feature selectivity, such as spike-triggered covariance (STC) or maximally informative dimensions (MID), are limited to Gaussian stimuli or are only able to identify a small number of features due to the curse of dimensionality. To overcome these issues, we propose two new dimensionality reduction methods that use minimum and maximum information models. These methods are information theoretic extensions of STC that can be used with non-Gaussian stimulus distributions to find relevant linear subspaces of arbitrary dimensionality. We compare these new methods to the conventional methods in two ways: with biologically-inspired simulated neurons responding to natural images and with recordings from macaque retinal and thalamic cells responding to naturalistic time-varying stimuli. With non-Gaussian stimuli, the minimum and maximum information methods significantly outperform STC in all cases, whereas MID performs best in the regime of low dimensional feature spaces. Neurons are capable of simultaneously encoding information about multiple features of sensory stimuli in their spikes. The dimensionality reduction methods that currently exist to extract those relevant features are either biased for non-Gaussian stimuli or fall victim to the curse of dimensionality. In this paper we introduce two information theoretic extensions of the spike-triggered covariance method. These new methods use the concepts of minimum and maximum mutual information to identify the stimulus features encoded in the spikes of a neuron. Using simulated and experimental neural data, these methods are shown to perform well both in situations where conventional approaches are appropriate and where they fail. These new techniques should improve the characterization of neural feature selectivity in areas of the brain where the application of currently available approaches is restricted.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
Cavanaugh, JR;Bair, W;Movshon, JA
通讯作者:
Movshon, JA
影响因子:
16.2
作者:
Atencio, Craig A.;Sharpee, Tatyana O.;Schreiner, Christoph E.
通讯作者:
Schreiner, Christoph E.
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
Fairhall, Adrienne L.;Burlingame, C. Andrew;Berry, Michael J., II
通讯作者:
Berry, Michael J., II
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.0706938104
发表时间:
2007-11-27
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Chen, Xiaodong;Han, Feng;Dan, Yang
通讯作者:
Dan, Yang
影响因子:
1.2
作者:
Kim AJ;Lazar AA;Slutskiy YB
通讯作者:
Slutskiy YB