Visitation policies at NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Visitation policies at NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s00520-021-06183-z
复制
发表时间:
2021-09
期刊:
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Sinclair CT
Sinclair CT
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yeh JC;Subbiah IM;Dhawan N;Thompson BW;Hildner Z;Jawed A;Prommer E;Sinclair CT

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

家庭/照顾者探视为癌症患者提供了关键支持,并与积极的治疗结果相关。然而,新冠疫情带来了历史性的干扰,包括广泛的探视限制。在此,我们深入描述了美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)指定的综合癌症中心(CCCs)的探视政策,并分析了这些中心在地理和时间上的模式。 对面向公众的综合癌症中心网站(包括存档网页)进行了审查,以提取初始探视政策及其修订内容,包括临终(EoL)例外情况以及探视限制相对于地区封锁的时间。采用卡方检验和费舍尔精确检验来分析地理区域、时间以及限制的严格程度之间的关联。 大多数综合癌症中心(n = 43,86%)在2020年3月15日至4月15日期间实施了探视限制。约一半的中心禁止所有新冠检测阴性的住院患者(n = 24,48%)或门诊患者(n = 26,52%)的探视者进入。大多数(n = 36,72%)禁止确诊/疑似新冠患者有探视者。大多数(n = 40,80%)公布了临终例外情况,但具体细节差异很大。从最初实施限制到政府强制封锁的中位时间为1天,范围很广(从提前25天到滞后26天)。初始限制的时间与地理位置(p = 0.14)或住院政策的严格程度(p = 1.0)之间没有关联,即使在同一城市的中心之间也是如此。被动(在封锁之后)公布的门诊政策比主动(在封锁之前)公布的政策更为严格(p = 0.04)。 综合癌症中心实施了严格但差异显著的新冠探视限制,这对寻求癌症治疗的患者/家庭具有重要影响。需要一种统一的、基于证据的探视政策制定方法,以在已证实的感染控制措施与患者及家属的需求之间取得平衡。
Family/caregiver visitation provides critical support for patients confronting cancer and is associated with positive outcomes. However, the COVID-19 pandemic brought historic disruptions including widespread visitation restrictions. Here, we characterize in-depth the visitor policies of NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers (CCCs) and analyze geographic/temporal patterns across CCCs. The public-facing CCC websites, including archived webpages, were reviewed to abstract initial visitation policies and revisions, including end-of-life (EoL) exceptions and timing of visitation restrictions relative to regional lockdowns. Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests were employed to analyze associations between geographic region, timing, and severity of restrictions. Most CCCs (n=43, 86%) enacted visitation restrictions between March 15 and April 15, 2020. About half barred all visitors for COVID-negative inpatients (n=24, 48%) or outpatients (n=26, 52%). Most (n=36, 72%) prohibited visitors for patients with confirmed/suspected COVID-19. Most (n=40, 80%) published EoL exceptions but the specifics were highly variable. The median time from initial restrictions to government-mandated lockdowns was 1 day, with a wide range (25 days before to 26 days after). There was no association between timing of initial restrictions and geographic location (p=0.14) or severity of inpatient policies (p=1.0), even among centers in the same city. Outpatient policies published reactively (after lockdown) were more restrictive than those published proactively (p=0.04). CCCs enacted strict but strikingly variable COVID-19 visitation restrictions, with important implications for patients/families seeking cancer care. A unified, evidence-based approach to visitation policies is needed to balance proven infection control measures with the needs of patients and families.
DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181d41d45
发表时间: 2010-04-01
影响因子: 8.8
作者:
Poalillo, F. Elizabeth;Geiling, James;Jimenez, Edgar J.
通讯作者: Jimenez, Edgar J.
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.105.572537
发表时间: 2006-02-21
期刊: CIRCULATION
影响因子: 37.8
作者:
Fumagalli, S;Boncinelli, L;Marchionni, N
通讯作者: Marchionni, N