Centre-State Bargaining and Territorial Accommodation: Evidence from India
Centre-State Bargaining and Territorial Accommodation: Evidence from India
复制标题
中央国家谈判和领土调整：来自印度的证据
DOI：
10.1111/spsr.12233
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Wilfried Swenden
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wilfried Swenden
本文评估了印度领土管理的演变。它显示了印度如何在近几十年来逐渐从独立时相对“一体化”的领土战略转向更“民族主义”的战略。民主的深化和最近的自由化为国家政治和经济自治开辟了更大的空间。然而，在东北部的一些小而重要的边境国家，这些国家可以被视为“少数民族”，这一战略的局限性显然暴露出来。我认为，印度宪法的灵活性，使语言重组的背景下，在独立后的最初几十年的一个更压抑的中心战略，印度的少数民族形成鲜明对比。本文试图解释为什么后者国家的谈判地位一直比较薄弱，为什么该中心一直比较少，在其方法，这些国家的承诺。
This article assesses the evolution of territorial management in India across time. It shows how India gradually moved away from a relatively ‘integrationist’ territorial strategy at independence towards a more ‘accommodationist’ strategy’ in recent decades. The deepening of democracy, and more recently, liberalization have opened up more room for state political and economic autonomy. However, the limits of an accommodative strategy are clearly exposed in relation to the small but significant border states of the North East which can be seen as ‘minority nations’. I argue that the flexibility of the Indian constitution which enabled an accommodative response in the context of linguistic reorganization during the early decades after independence contrasts with a more repressive centric strategy in relation to India's minority nations. The article seeks to explain why the bargaining position of the latter states has been comparatively weak and why the centre has been comparatively less accommodative in its approach to these states.
土耳其的中心与边缘冲突与意识形态距离
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Kaiser;Sadioğlu
通讯作者：
Sadioğlu