Pretence and Echo: Towards an Integrated Account of Verbal Irony

Pretence and Echo: Towards an Integrated Account of Verbal Irony
复制标题

假装与回声:对言语反讽的综合描述

DOI:
10.1163/18773109-00601007
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
0.8
通讯作者:
Mihaela Popa
Mihaela Popa
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mihaela Popa

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

关于讽刺的两种对立的说法分别声称,伪装和回声独立地足以解释核心案例。在强调了这些描述的优点和缺点之后,我认为,伪装和回声都扮演着重要角色的描述更好地解释了这些案例,也有助于解释外围案例。我区分了“弱”和“强”混合理论,并主张一个“整合的强混合”理论,在这个理论中,伪装和附和的元素在一个统一的机制中被视为互补的。我认为,所谓相互排斥的伪装和回声元素实际上是丰富核心结构的互补方面,如下所示:通过假装有一个观点/思想F,一个讽刺的说话者U呼应了一个观点/思想G。F只是假装的,可能是讽刺的或夸张的,而G是真实的/可能的。
Two rival accounts of irony claim, respectively, that pretence and echo are independently sufficient to explain central cases. After highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of these accounts, I argue that an account in which both pretence and echo play an essential role better explains these cases and serves to explain peripheral cases as well. I distinguish between “weak” and “strong” hybrid theories, and advocate an “integrated strong hybrid” account in which elements of both pretence and echo are seen as complementary in a unified mechanism. I argue that the allegedly mutually exclusive elements of pretence and echo are in fact complementary aspects enriching a core-structure as follows: by pretending to have a perspective/thought F, an ironic speaker U echoes a perspective/thought G. F is merely pretended, perhaps caricaturised or exaggerated, while G is real/possible.
再来一块馅饼怎么样:话语反讽的暗示假装理论。
DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.124.1.3
发表时间: 1995
期刊: Journal of experimental psychology. General.
影响因子: --
作者:
Kumon-Nakamura,S;Glucksberg,S;Brown,M
通讯作者: Brown,M