Regulatory fit effects on stimulus identification.

Regulatory fit effects on stimulus identification.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3758/s13414-010-0068-4
复制
发表时间:
2011-04
期刊:
Attention, perception & psychophysics
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Markman AB
Markman AB
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Glass BD;Maddox WT;Markman AB

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

本文探讨了一个人的全球监管重点和本地任务奖励结构之间的配合知觉加工和判断的影响。在每一次试验中,参与者都被要求从两个简单的刺激中选择一个,并被要求识别它,参与者被置于促进焦点(情境诱导的对收益的敏感性)或预防焦点(情境诱导的对损失的敏感性),并被要求最大化收益或最小化损失。一个不对称的回报率偏向于一个识别反应的整体奖励。两个实验测试了内部熟悉度和知觉敏感度低或高时调节契合的作用。当熟悉度和敏感度低,参与者在监管配合(促进重点与收益或预防重点与损失)表现出更大的知觉敏感性,但没有反应偏差的差异,相对于参与者在监管不匹配。当熟悉度和敏感度较高时,调节契合的参与者表现出对高回报刺激的反应偏差,但感知敏感度没有差异。推测这种影响的神经生物学基础,以及这项工作的临床疾病,如抑郁症的影响,提供。
This article examines the effects of a fit between a person's global regulatory focus and the local task reward structure on perceptual processing and judgment. On each trial, participants were presented with one of two briefly presented stimuli and were asked to identify it. Participants were placed in a promotion focus (a situationally induced sensitivity to gains) or a prevention focus (a situationally induced sensitivity to losses) and were asked to maximize gains or minimize losses. An asymmetric payoff ratio biased the overall reward toward one identification response over the other. Two experiments tested the role of regulatory fit when internal familiarity and perceptual sensitivity was low or high. When familiarity and sensitivity were low, participants in a regulatory fit (promotion focus with gains or a prevention focus with losses) showed greater perceptual sensitivity, but no response bias differences relative to participants in a regulatory mismatch. When familiarity and sensitivity were high, participants in a regulatory fit showed a response bias toward the high payoff stimulus, but no differences in perceptual sensitivity. Speculation on the neurobiological basis of this effect, as well as implications of this work for clinical disorders, such as depression, is offered.
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.7.5.344
发表时间: 1981-01-01
期刊: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN LEARNING AND MEMORY
影响因子: --
作者:
HEALY, AF;KUBOVY, M
通讯作者: KUBOVY, M
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00100-8
发表时间: 2004-03-01
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Amodio, DM;Shah, JY;Harmon-Jones, E
通讯作者: Harmon-Jones, E
DOI: 10.3758/bf03195904
发表时间: 2006-10-01
期刊: MEMORY & COGNITION
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Maddox, W. Todd;Baldwin, Grant C.;Markman, Arthur B.
通讯作者: Markman, Arthur B.
DOI: 10.1017/s0048577298000134
发表时间: 1998-09-01
期刊: PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Davidson, RJ
通讯作者: Davidson, RJ
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.6.1459
发表时间: 1998-11-01
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Maddox, WT;Bohil, CJ
通讯作者: Bohil, CJ