A psychoeducational intervention (SWEEP) for depressed women with diabetes.

A psychoeducational intervention (SWEEP) for depressed women with diabetes.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s12160-012-9377-2
复制
发表时间:
2012-10
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Lustman, Patrick
Lustman, Patrick
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Penckofer, Sue M.;Ferrans, Carol;Mumby, Patricia;Byrn, Mary;Emanuele, Mary Ann;Harrison, Patrick R.;Durazo-Arvizu, Ramon A.;Lustman, Patrick

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

临床上有显著抑郁症状的2型糖尿病患者占25%,女性患抑郁症的风险翻倍。为了检验女性情绪和心理教育评估研究(SWEEP)的有效性,基于认知行为治疗原则对女性2型糖尿病患者进行了抑郁症治疗的团体治疗。抑郁症状明显升高的女性(流行病学研究中心抑郁量表≥16)被随机分配到SWEEP组(n=38)或常规治疗组(n= 36)。多水平模型显示,SWEEP在减少抑郁(平均差值为-15比-7,p< 0.01)、减少特质焦虑(平均差值为-15比-5,p< 0.01)和改善愤怒表达(平均差值为-12比-5,p< 0.05)方面比UC更有效。虽然SWEEP和UC在空腹血糖(平均差值为-24 vs -1 mg/dl)和HbA1c(平均差值为-0.4 vs - 0.1%)方面有改善,但两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。在治疗2型糖尿病女性抑郁症方面,SWEEP比UC更有效。抑郁症团体治疗的加入,有意义地扩展了女性糖尿病患者循证治疗选择的范围。
Clinically significant depression is present in 25 % of individuals with type 2 diabetes, its risk being doubled in women. To examine the effectiveness of the Study of Women's Emotions and Evaluation of a Psychoeducational (SWEEP), a group therapy for depression treatment based on cognitive behavioral therapy principles that was developed for women with type 2 diabetes was conducted. Women with significantly elevated depression symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale ≥16) were randomized to SWEEP (n=38) or usual care (UC, n=36). Multilevel modeling indicated that SWEEP was more effective than UC in reducing depression (mean difference of –15 vs. –7, p<.01), decreasing trait anxiety (mean difference of –15 vs. –5, p<.01), and improving anger expression (mean difference of –12 vs. –5, p<.05). Although SWEEP and UC had improvements in fasting glucose (mean difference of –24 vs. –1 mg/dl) and HbA1c (mean difference of –0.4 vs. –0.1 %), there were no statistically significant differences between groups. SWEEP was more effective than UC for treating depressed women with type 2 diabetes. Addition of group therapy for depression meaningfully expands the armamentarium of evidence-based treatment options for women with diabetes.
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1367-0
发表时间: 2010-09-01
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Epstein, Ronald M.;Duberstein, Paul R.;Paterniti, Debora A.
通讯作者: Paterniti, Debora A.
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.06.002
发表时间: 2007-09-01
影响因子: 7
作者:
Egede, Leonard E.
通讯作者: Egede, Leonard E.
DOI: 10.2190/klgd-4h8d-4ryl-twq8
发表时间: 2002-01-01
影响因子: 2
作者:
Anderson, RJ;Grigsby, AB;Lustman, PJ
通讯作者: Lustman, PJ
DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.379
发表时间: 2008-05-01
期刊: HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Abraham, Charles;Michie, Susan
通讯作者: Michie, Susan
DOI: 10.1159/000110057
发表时间: 2008-01-01
影响因子: 22.8
作者:
Cowan, Marie J.;Freedland, Kenneth E.;Czajkowski, Susan M.
通讯作者: Czajkowski, Susan M.