Direct State Intervention in the Labor Market: The Explanation of Active Labor Market Policy from 1950-88 in Social Democratic, Conservative, and Liberal Regimes

国家对劳动力市场的直接干预：1950-88年社会民主主义、保守主义和自由主义政权积极劳动力市场政策的解释

• 批准号: 9211542
• 负责人: Thomas Janoski
• 金额: $ 3.01万
• 依托单位: Duke University
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 1992
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 1992-07-15 至 1994-06-30
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=9211542&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Direct; State; Intervention; Labor; Market

This is a study of active labor market policies, such as job placement, job training, and job creation policies in 17 nations from 1950 to 1988. Active labor market policies consist of direct government intervention into labor markets for the primary purpose of reducing unemployment. It presumes that participants are ready and willing to work. Labor market policies constitute the most active policy in the otherwise passive welfare state repertoire, because its goals are to make the labor force more flexible in adjusting to the restructuring of the domestic and international economies. The focus of the study is to examine the relationship between the political and economic characteristics of a society and its labor market policies. Data from official statistics in the 17 countries will be analyzed using time-series models, pooled cross-sectional models, and a combination of regression analysis and institutional analysis. This study will make a major contribution to the understanding of the conditions under which governments will develop active welfare state policies aimed at reintegrating citizens into the labor market rather than relying on more passive policies such as welfare benefits.

这是对1950 ~ 1988年17个国家的就业安置、就业培训、创造就业岗位等积极的劳动市场政策进行研究的结果。积极的劳动力市场政策包括政府对劳动力市场的直接干预，其主要目的是减少失业。它假定参与者准备好并愿意工作。劳动力市场政策是消极的福利国家中最积极的政策，因为其目标是使劳动力更灵活地适应国内和国际经济的结构调整。这项研究的重点是研究一个社会的政治和经济特征与其劳动力市场政策之间的关系。来自17个国家的官方统计数据将使用时间序列模型、汇总横截面模型以及回归分析和体制分析相结合的方法进行分析。这项研究将对理解政府制定积极的福利国家政策的条件做出重大贡献，这些政策旨在使公民重新融入劳动力市场，而不是依赖于福利等更被动的政策。