权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

SGER: Optimal Design Lexicon, and Construction of ObjectiveFunctions

SGER：优化设计词典和目标函数的构造

基本信息

批准号：
9615306
负责人：
Achille Messac
金额：
$ 9.24万
依托单位：
Northeastern University
依托单位国家：
美国
项目类别：
Standard Grant
财政年份：
1996
资助国家：
美国
起止时间：
1996-09-01 至 1999-08-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=9615306&HistoricalAwards=false
关键词：
SGER Optimal Design Lexicon Construction

项目摘要

9615306 Messac This is a Small Grant for Exploratory Research to examine the use of language in the engineering design literature. Engineering design has failed to emerge clearly as an engineering discipline in part because it has been impeded by a lack of a clear lexicon for communication, and researchers in the field have been reluctant to create a lexicon. Indeed, the current use of language in design encompasses a broad range of disparate definitions for some key words. In a few cases, the same researcher has used a word repeatedly in a single paper, each time with a substantially different definition. The research funded under this grant will survey the design literature and provide and publish a collection of definitions for words that are key to the field. It is hoped that, by providing a list of words key to the field of engineering design together with the disparate definitions assigned to them by different researchers, the engineering design research community will obtain a clearer view of the confusion created by this chaotic situation. This effort could form the basis of a dialog that will result in better communication among researchers in the field and subsequently improve the efficacy of research in the field. Clarity of language in itself can also lead to better design education and improved design tools. All of these factors contribute to the success of American industry.

小行星9615306 这是一个探索性研究的小额补助金，用于研究工程设计文献中语言的使用。工程设计未能作为一门工程学科清晰地出现，部分原因是由于缺乏一个清晰的词汇，通信，和研究人员在该领域一直不愿意创建一个词汇。事实上，目前在设计中使用的语言包含了一些关键词的广泛的不同定义。在少数情况下，同一个研究人员在一篇论文中重复使用一个词，每次都有实质性不同的定义。这项资助的研究将调查设计文献，并提供和出版一系列对该领域至关重要的单词的定义。希望通过提供一个工程设计领域的关键词列表以及不同研究人员分配给它们的不同定义，工程设计研究界将更清楚地了解这种混乱局面所造成的混乱。这一努力可以形成对话的基础，这将导致该领域研究人员之间更好的沟通，并随后提高该领域研究的效率。语言本身的清晰度也可以带来更好的设计教育和改进的设计工具。所有这些因素都有助于成功美国工业。