课题基金 / 基金详情

ITR: Collaborative Research in Internet Topology Models - A Foundation for Large-Scale Simulations

ITR: Collaborative Research in Internet Topology Models - A Foundation for Large-Scale Simulations
ITR:互联网拓扑模型的协作研究 - 大规模模拟的基础
批准号:
0082318
负责人:
Kenneth Calvert
金额:
$11.24万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Continuing Grant
财政年份:
2000
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2000-09-01 至 2005-05-31

项目摘要

项目成果

Kenneth Calvert的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Network simulation is an indispensable tool for researchers seeking to understand the principles of network architecture and protocol design. A key parameter in any moderate to large-scale simulation is the topology, i.e., the way the nodes of the network are organized and connected to each other. "Good" models for topology are essential for good simulations. The PIs have developed graph modeling software that currently is widely used as a tool for generating topologies, particularly models of large internetworks. The Georgia Tech Internet Topology Models (GT-ITM) package allows researchers to construct model topologies whose structure arguably resembles the node-level structure of the Internet: routers or switches, connected by (bidirectional) links, and grouped into domains. The GT-ITM software is included with "ns2" [2], the defacto open-source standard for network simulation. Despite the wide-spread use of GT-ITM, in general, and its transit-stub model, in particular, a number of critical and fundamental questions remain unanswered about network topology modeling. For example, 1)Topology models. Recent data indicates that the current Internet topology has some properties that are not well reflected in the transit-stub model of GT-ITM [17]. For example, features such as the exchanges where many transit domains come together are lacking. Are there "better" techniques to generate topologies intended to model the Internet? More fundamentally, how should a topology generation technique be evaluated (i.e., how is "better" measured)? 2)Topology scaling. Although strides are being made in supporting large-scale simulations [33], most researchers will continue to simulate their protocols on topologies that are smaller than the target operational large-scale networks. How should smaller topologies be configured so that they reasonable reflect their larger counterparts? Is there a theory of topology scaling that can provide the fundamental grounding for configuring topologies of various sizes? 3)Topology use. The PIs primary interest in topology modeling is to provide a foundation for large-scale simulations. Facilitating the use of topologies in simulations must go beyond providing theoretically sound models, however, and include a set of complementary tools for graph visualization, routing table construction, etc. What visualization tools are useful to researchers and assist in accurate intuitive understanding of underlying topology? How can different routing policies be effectively reflected in routing table construction? The researchers propose (1) to address these and other fundamental questions in the area of topology modeling and (2) to reflect their understanding in a set of topology tools and benchmarks made available to the research community at large. This work will build on the PIs prior experience in modeling internetworks. The proposed work will contribute to fundamental understanding in the area of topology modeling. The work will include a set of evaluation criteria to assess the quality of a topology generation method and improvements in topology models. The work will also produce an evolutionary theory of topology scaling, with implications for efficient simulation using topologies that are smaller than the target. In addition to contributions to fundamental understanding, a central component of the proposed work is a set of tools and benchmarks to be made available to the research community at large, following in the tradition of the GT-ITM suite. These tools will allow other researchers to generate topologies, assess the quality of candidate topology modeling methods, utilize benchmarks based on current and future technologies, and interact with a visualization of topology.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
CRI-II-NEW: Collaborative Research: Measurement Infrastructure for Home Networks
NetSE: Medium: Collaborative Research: Towards Human-Network Interaction (HNI) for the Home
NeTS-NBD: Collaborative Research: Human-Centered Networking for the Home
Nets-FIND: Collaborative Research: Postmodern Internetwork Architecture
海外基金