Dissertation Research: Decisions at Scientific Agencies: How Do the NIH and the FDA Balance Expert Opinions, Changing Agendas, and Political Pressure?
论文研究:科学机构的决策:NIH 和 FDA 如何平衡专家意见、不断变化的议程和政治压力?
基本信息
- 批准号:0423238
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 0.8万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:美国
- 项目类别:Standard Grant
- 财政年份:2004
- 资助国家:美国
- 起止时间:2004-08-01 至 2005-07-31
- 项目状态:已结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:
项目摘要
How do scientific agencies fulfill their science mandates in a democracy that asks them to consider non-scientific factors? Why might the NIH and the FDA, both scientific agencies that address medical policy, have different reactions to similar pressure? This Research on Science and Technology Dissertation Improvement Grant will examine how these two agencies balance the conflicting tensions associated with the need to rely on scientific experts, mandates to improve health, and their responses to competing pressures from Congress and interest groups. The analysis will focus on the period 1970-2003 and will examine the impacts of the women's and minority health social movements, Congressional oversight, and agency decision-making processes on NIH grant awards and FDA drug approval decisions. The agencies are hypothesized to respond differently to pressure because of important internal differences in their decision-making processes, such as how they use expert panels, as well as external differences in their interest group environments. The research will employ both qualitative and quantitative methods, including interviews with agency, Congressional, and interest group leaders and staff, review of archival materials, and multivariate analysis of agency decisions such as the speed of new drug review and research grant funding. Throughout the analysis, the comparisons between these two scientific agencies will highlight their potentially similar and differential responses to their political environments. The contribution of this dissertation will be in several areas. First, the conceptual analysis will analyze the characteristics of scientific agencies, a class of agencies that have not been adequately examined, and propose testable hypotheses about their behavior. Second, this study will be the first to examine the impacts of the women's and minority health movements on scientific agencies and will be the first to explore the expanded role of women, minorities, and patients in scientific agencies. Understanding how these agencies responded to these changes will help policymakers broaden the participation of underrepresented groups. Third, this study will compare priority setting at two federal agencies responsible for producing and utilizing scientific knowledge. The study will be the first comprehensive analysis of how politics affect the research process at the NIH and will contribute to the growing literature on the politics of FDA regulation. Fourth, this dissertation will show how scientific agencies combine technical expertise with responsiveness to the public and the health needs of the population. The study will explain how these agencies have resolved this issue over the last 33 years, which has important implications for understanding science policies and the processes that generate science policies.
在一个要求科学机构考虑非科学因素的民主国家,科学机构如何履行其科学使命?为什么国家卫生研究院和食品药品监督管理局,这两个处理医疗政策的科学机构,对类似的压力有不同的反应?这项科学技术论文改进研究补助金将研究这两个机构如何平衡与依赖科学专家的需要、改善健康的任务以及它们对来自国会和利益集团的竞争压力的反应相关的冲突紧张局势。分析将集中在1970年至2003年期间,并将审查妇女和少数民族健康的社会运动,国会监督和机构决策过程对NIH拨款奖励和FDA药物批准决定的影响。据推测,各机构对压力的反应不同,因为它们在决策过程中存在重要的内部差异,例如它们如何使用专家小组,以及它们的利益集团环境的外部差异。该研究将采用定性和定量方法,包括与机构,国会和利益集团领导人和工作人员的访谈,档案材料的审查,以及机构决策的多变量分析,如新药审查和研究资助的速度。在整个分析过程中,这两个科学机构之间的比较将突出他们对政治环境的潜在相似和不同的反应。 本论文的贡献将在几个方面。首先,概念分析将分析科学机构的特征,这是一类尚未得到充分研究的机构,并提出关于其行为的可验证假设。第二,这项研究将是第一个研究妇女和少数民族健康运动对科学机构的影响,并将是第一个探讨妇女,少数民族和病人在科学机构中的作用扩大。了解这些机构如何应对这些变化将有助于决策者扩大代表性不足群体的参与。第三,本研究将比较负责生产和利用科学知识的两个联邦机构的优先事项设置。这项研究将是第一次全面分析政治如何影响NIH的研究过程,并将有助于不断增长的关于FDA监管政治的文献。第四,本论文将展示科学机构如何将联合收割机技术专长与对公众和人口健康需求的响应相结合。该研究将解释这些机构在过去33年中如何解决这一问题,这对理解科学政策和产生科学政策的过程具有重要意义。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
Karl Kronebusch其他文献
Karl Kronebusch的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
相似国自然基金
Research on Quantum Field Theory without a Lagrangian Description
- 批准号:24ZR1403900
- 批准年份:2024
- 资助金额:0.0 万元
- 项目类别:省市级项目
Cell Research
- 批准号:31224802
- 批准年份:2012
- 资助金额:24.0 万元
- 项目类别:专项基金项目
Cell Research
- 批准号:31024804
- 批准年份:2010
- 资助金额:24.0 万元
- 项目类别:专项基金项目
Cell Research (细胞研究)
- 批准号:30824808
- 批准年份:2008
- 资助金额:24.0 万元
- 项目类别:专项基金项目
Research on the Rapid Growth Mechanism of KDP Crystal
- 批准号:10774081
- 批准年份:2007
- 资助金额:45.0 万元
- 项目类别:面上项目
相似海外基金
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Fertility and Reproductive Health Decisions in Response to Climate Change and Adaptation in Greenland
博士论文研究:格陵兰岛应对气候变化和适应的生育率和生殖健康决策
- 批准号:
2330886 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 0.8万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research in DRMS: Evaluating the Effects of Financial and Temporal Scarcity on Farmer Decisions to Engage in Conservation
DRMS 博士论文研究:评估财务和时间稀缺对农民参与保护决策的影响
- 批准号:
1949379 - 财政年份:2020
- 资助金额:
$ 0.8万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Social Opportunity and Decisions about Environmental Change
博士论文研究:社会机会与环境变化决策
- 批准号:
1904324 - 财政年份:2019
- 资助金额:
$ 0.8万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Factors Influencing Risk Perception and Movement Decisions in Coastal Louisiana
博士论文研究:路易斯安那州沿海地区风险认知和行动决策的影响因素
- 批准号:
1851571 - 财政年份:2019
- 资助金额:
$ 0.8万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research in Economics: Female Underemployment - Job Attributes and Labor Supply Decisions
经济学博士论文研究:女性就业不足——工作属性与劳动力供给决策
- 批准号:
1824373 - 财政年份:2018
- 资助金额:
$ 0.8万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Exploring Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Plea Bargaining Decisions
博士论文研究:探索辩诉交易决策背后的心理机制
- 批准号:
1823500 - 财政年份:2018
- 资助金额:
$ 0.8万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research in Economics: Experimental Evidence on Individual Labor Supply Decisions
经济学博士论文研究:个体劳动力供给决策的实验证据
- 批准号:
1729822 - 财政年份:2017
- 资助金额:
$ 0.8万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Ballot Structure and Voting Decisions
博士论文研究:选票结构和投票决定
- 批准号:
1561248 - 财政年份:2016
- 资助金额:
$ 0.8万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research: An Anthropological Investigation of the Relationship between Values, Land Use Decisions, and Market-based Mechanisms
博士论文研究:价值、土地利用决策和市场机制之间关系的人类学调查
- 批准号:
1357296 - 财政年份:2014
- 资助金额:
$ 0.8万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research: The Intersection of Place Attachment, Aspirations, and Rapidly Changing Environments on Decisions to Support Resettlement
博士论文研究:地方依恋、愿望和快速变化的环境对支持移民安置决策的影响
- 批准号:
1433978 - 财政年份:2014
- 资助金额:
$ 0.8万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant