The Third Branch in the Fourth Estate: The Media's Role in the Diffusion of Legal Knowledge

第四阶层的第三个分支：媒体在传播法律知识中的作用

• 批准号: 0751834
• 负责人: Kevin Quinn
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Harvard University
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2008
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2008-03-15 至 2010-09-30
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=0751834&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Third; Branch; Fourth; Estate; Media

Virtually all scholarship about public opinion and the Court ispredicated on the view that the media are principal actors indiffusion of knowledge about the Court. Yet most Court reporters havelittle to no legal training and media coverage may conflict sharplywith views in the legal community. So, what role does the media playin the public understanding of the Court? Do news and editorialboards exercise discretion in writing about law in systematicallydistinguishable ways? What are these implications for the studyof judicial politics? What are the normative implications?To date, virtually no systematic, large-scale, empirical examinationhas shed light on the foundational role that the media play in thediffusion of legal knowledge. This project fills thatvoid by: -- characterizing how the media, via hard news stories and editorials, has portrayed the workings of the Supreme Court over time, across cases, and across outlets; -- assessing how media coverage of the Court differs from the understanding in the legal community; -- providing publicly available data and summary measures that describe how media outlets disseminate information about the Supreme Court; -- providing documented, easy-to-use software for the statistical analysis of newspaper articles and editorials.The project is the first assessment of media coverage of theCourt that examines all news stories and editorials on the Courtwritten by over 20 major newspapers in a 10 year period. A majorportion of the project is the development of widely-applicable,easy-to-use software and statistical methods for analyzing the contentof news articles. In so doing, the principal investigators are positioned to address foundational questions in how, what, when,where, and why the media reports on the Court.

几乎所有关于舆论和法院的学术研究都是基于这样一种观点，即媒体是传播关于法院的知识的主要行为者。然而，大多数法庭记者几乎没有接受过法律培训，媒体报道可能与法律界的观点严重冲突。那么，媒体在公众对法院的理解中扮演了什么角色？新闻和编辑委员会在撰写关于法律的文章时是否以系统区分的方式行使自由裁量权？这些对司法政治研究的启示是什么？规范的含义是什么？到目前为止，几乎没有系统的、大规模的、经验性的审查揭示了媒体在传播法律知识方面所起的基础性作用。该项目通过以下方式填补这一空白：--通过硬新闻报道和社论描述媒体如何在一段时间内、跨案件和跨媒体描述最高法院的工作；--评估媒体对最高法院的报道与法律界的理解有何不同；--提供可公开获得的数据和描述媒体如何传播关于最高法院的信息的摘要措施；-提供记录在案的、易于使用的软件，用于报纸文章和社论的统计分析。该项目是对法院媒体报道的第一次评估，审查了20多家主要报纸在10年内关于法院的所有新闻报道和社论。该项目的一个主要部分是开发广泛适用、易于使用的软件和统计方法，以分析新闻文章的内容。在这样做的过程中，主要调查员能够处理媒体如何、什么、何时、何地和为什么报道法院的基本问题。