Standard Research Grant: Trading Codes between Industry and Academia

标准研究补助金：工业界和学术界之间的交易代码

• 批准号: 1026516
• 负责人: Daniel Kleinman
• 金额: $ 10.38万
• 依托单位: University of Wisconsin-Madison
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Continuing Grant
• 财政年份: 2010
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2010-09-15 至 2012-08-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1026516&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Standard; Research; Grant; Trading; Codes

This project explores how university administrators have used commercial language and how industry managers have drawn upon academic codes in their efforts to describe, justify, and explain the activities in their respective domains, examining change over time in this trading of codes. Intellectual meritThe premise of this research is that the nature of university-industry interaction is considerably more complicated than the debates about academic-business relations suggest. Through an analysis of periodicals read and written by academic administrators and science-based industry leaders, the PI intends to explore the subtle and varied changes that the cultures of US academia and science-based industry have experienced as a product of their interaction over the period between 1960 and 2000. Broader impact With the advent of the biotechnology revolution in the 1970s, concern grew that university research agendas would be increasingly be set by industry and that the free flow of information characteristic of academic science would be stifled. Indeed, since the 1970s calls for policies that protect the relative autonomy of university science have been repeatedly called for by academic scientists and administrators and state and federal policymakers. The PI will disseminate results to academic and non-academic audiences. Findings will inform debates about the virtues and the drawbacks for academia and industry of the blurring of university and commercial cultures.

该项目探讨了大学管理者如何使用商业语言，以及行业管理者如何利用学术规范来描述、证明和解释各自领域的活动，并研究这种规范交易随时间的变化。智力价值这项研究的前提是，大学与企业互动的本质比学术与企业关系的争论所表明的要复杂得多。 通过对学术管理者和科学行业领导者阅读和撰写的期刊进行分析，PI 旨在探索美国学术界和科学行业文化在 1960 年至 2000 年间相互作用的产物所经历的微妙而多样的变化。 更广泛的影响 随着 20 世纪 70 年代生物技术革命的到来，人们越来越担心大学研究议程将越来越多地由行业制定，以及学术科学的信息自由流动特征 会被窒息。 事实上，自 20 世纪 70 年代以来，学术科学家、行政人员以及州和联邦政策制定者一再呼吁制定保护大学科学相对自主权的政策。 PI 将向学术和非学术受众传播结果。研究结果将为学术界和工业界关于大学和商业文化模糊的优点和缺点的辩论提供信息。