课题基金 / 基金详情

Doctoral Dissertation Research in Economics: Public Funding of Sanitation Infrastructure: An analysis of Voter Behavior and Health Outcomes

Doctoral Dissertation Research in Economics: Public Funding of Sanitation Infrastructure: An analysis of Voter Behavior and Health Outcomes
经济学博士论文研究:卫生基础设施的公共资助:选民行为和健康结果的分析
批准号:
1357995
负责人:
Philip Hoffman
金额:
$1.5万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Standard Grant
财政年份:
2014
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2014-05-15 至 2015-07-31

项目摘要

项目成果

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
清洁的水和下水道对经济发展至关重要。但是,尽管经典的理论结果预测,随着政府变得民主,在清洁水和下水道方面的支出会增加,但这种卫生基础设施的提供如何受到政治制度的影响仍不得而知。然而,这些理论论文以及大多数实证研究都集中在政府再分配上。他们忽略了一个非常现实的可能性,即对卫生基础设施的需求正在增加,如果是这样,那么民主可能与清洁水和下水道的支出减少有关,尤其是在穷人获得投票权的情况下。拟议的研究使用原始数据集,试图通过研究政府对卫生基础设施的投资如何受到扩大穷人投票权的影响及其对健康和死亡率的影响,来解决这一问题。数据集来自1870-1914年的英国。19世纪的英国为检验政治制度如何影响政府在卫生基础设施上的支出提供了一个宝贵的机会。伴随着工业革命的快速城市化使现有的卫生基础设施不堪重负,并使地方政府面临着对公共产品的新需求,而他们却没有能力应对。该研究利用了不同时期和不同城镇选民规模的变化,来测试延长特许经营权对卫生投资水平和死亡率的影响。该项目构建了一个新的综合年度数据集,包括死亡率、卫生投资和乡镇一级的特许经营范围。除了测试政治制度对基础设施支出的影响外,该数据集还将用于确定卫生投资对这一时期死亡率下降的重要性,这将揭示地方政府应对城市化带来的健康后果的能力。此外,这项研究将补充经济历史学家最近在衡量和解释地方政府能力增长以及重要的卫生基础设施投资方面的工作。在项目结束时,将努力通过全球价格和收入历史小组或IPCSR公开提供这些数据。
英文摘要
Clean water and sewers are essential for economic development. But how the provision of such sanitation infrastructure is affected by political institutions remains unknown, even though classic theoretical results predict more spending on clean water and sewers as governments become democratic. However, these theoretical papers, as well as most empirical studies, focus on government redistribution. They ignore the very real possibility that demand for sanitary infrastructure is increasing in income, and if it is, then democracy could be associated with less spending on clean water and sewers, particularly when the poor get the right to vote. Using an original data set, the proposed research seeks to resolve this issue by studying how government investment in sanitation infrastructure is shaped by the extension of voting rights to the poor and its consequences for health and mortality rates.The data set comes from Britain in the years 1870-1914. Nineteenth-century Britain offers a valuable opportunity for testing how political institutions influenced government spending on sanitation infrastructure. The rapid urbanization accompanying the Industrial Revolution overwhelmed existing sanitary infrastructure, and left local governments facing new demands for public goods that they were ill-equipped to handle. The study exploits variation in the size of the electorate over time and across towns to test the effects of extending the franchise on the level of sanitary investment and mortality. This project constructs a new comprehensive annual dataset of mortality, sanitary investment and the extent of the franchise at town-level. In addition to testing the effect of political institutions on infrastructure spending, the dataset will also be used to identify the importance of sanitary investment for the decline in mortality rates during the period, which will shed light on the ability of subnational governments to counter the health consequences of urbanization. Further, the study will complement recent work by economic historians in measuring and explaining growth in government capacity at the local level and hence, importantly, investments in sanitation infrastructure. At the conclusion of the project efforts will be made to make the data publicly available through the Global Price and Incomes History group or the IPCSR.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金